vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Midland States Bancorp, Inc. (MSBI) and RICHARDSON ELECTRONICS, LTD. (RELL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Midland States Bancorp, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($79.5M vs $52.3M, roughly 1.5× RICHARDSON ELECTRONICS, LTD.). Midland States Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 23.2% vs -0.2%, a 23.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, RICHARDSON ELECTRONICS, LTD.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.3% CAGR vs -6.4%).
Rainier Bancorporation was the Seattle-based parent corporation of Rainier National Bank, a Washington state bank with branches throughout the state. Rainier traced its roots back to the National Bank of Commerce, which was founded by Richard Holyoke in 1889. The name Rainier National Bank was adopted in 1974. Rainier Bancorp expanded into Alaska with the purchase of Anchorage's People's Bank & Trust in 1983 and into Oregon with the purchase of Gresham's Mount Hood Security Bank in 1986, expa...
The James Richardson Corporation, also going by the name James Richardson Group or JR/Group, is an Australian furniture, hospitality, real estate and retail corporation, headquartered in the Abbotsford suburb of Melbourne, Australia. It is privately owned and employs approximately 2,300 people worldwide. It is perhaps best known among consumers for its duty-free retail stores in airports and border crossings in Australasia and the Middle East. The company is a household name in Israel due to ...
MSBI vs RELL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $79.5M | $52.3M |
| Net Profit | $18.5M | $-121.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 30.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 0.3% |
| Net Margin | 23.2% | -0.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 5.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 739.3% | 83.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.74 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $79.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $85.6M | $52.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $81.1M | $54.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $82.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.1M | $53.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.9M | $49.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.7M | $53.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | $18.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.9M | $-121.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.6M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-141.0M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.8M | $-751.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.4M | $590.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -181.2% | -5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -66.5% | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | 23.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -4.9% | -0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -185.4% | -3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -52.5% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.74 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.22 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.58 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.49 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.83 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.06 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $89.4M | $33.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $33.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $569.5M | $158.5M |
| Total Assets | $6.5B | $201.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.06× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $89.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.8M | $33.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $166.1M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $176.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $102.0M | $36.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.8M | $26.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.9M | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $124.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | $33.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $569.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $565.5M | $158.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $584.0M | $159.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $573.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $571.4M | $152.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $710.8M | $156.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $771.2M | $159.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $736.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | $6.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $201.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9B | $200.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3B | $189.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $195.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.7B | $197.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-99.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-1.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -3.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $7.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $125.7M | $-99.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.0M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.7M | $4.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $176.5M | $5.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.5M | $412.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $120.3M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.6M | $342.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.9M | $4.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $169.6M | $4.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.4M | $-514.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 140.6% | -3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 96.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.1% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 180.6% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.9% | -1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.2% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.58× | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.33× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.28× | 0.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.22× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MSBI
| Net Interest Income | $57.4M | 72% |
| Noninterest Income | $22.1M | 28% |
RELL
| Power And Microwave Technologies Group | $35.2M | 67% |
| Canvys | $8.8M | 17% |
| Global Energy Solutions | $8.3M | 16% |
