vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Midland States Bancorp, Inc. (MSBI) and RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC. (RGP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($117.7M vs $79.5M, roughly 1.5× Midland States Bancorp, Inc.). Midland States Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 23.2% vs -10.8%, a 34.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Midland States Bancorp, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-6.4% CAGR vs -11.8%).
Rainier Bancorporation was the Seattle-based parent corporation of Rainier National Bank, a Washington state bank with branches throughout the state. Rainier traced its roots back to the National Bank of Commerce, which was founded by Richard Holyoke in 1889. The name Rainier National Bank was adopted in 1974. Rainier Bancorp expanded into Alaska with the purchase of Anchorage's People's Bank & Trust in 1983 and into Oregon with the purchase of Gresham's Mount Hood Security Bank in 1986, expa...
RGP, formerly known as Resources Global Professionals, is the operating arm of Resources Connection, Inc.. The company provides consulting services in the areas of finance & accounting, information management, governance, risk & compliance (GRC), human capital, legal & regulatory, corporate advisory & restructuring, strategic communications, and supply chain management. As of fiscal year ending May 28, 2016, the company employed 3,283 professionals in 68 offices in 20 countries around the wor...
MSBI vs RGP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $79.5M | $117.7M |
| Net Profit | $18.5M | $-12.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -10.3% |
| Net Margin | 23.2% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -19.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 739.3% | 81.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.74 | $-0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $79.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $85.6M | $117.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $81.1M | $120.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $82.2M | $139.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.1M | $129.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.9M | $145.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.7M | $136.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.9M | $148.2M |
| Q1 26 | $18.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.9M | $-12.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.6M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | $-73.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-141.0M | $-44.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.8M | $-68.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.4M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.7M | $10.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 40.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.5% | -10.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.9% | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.1% | -47.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -181.2% | -38.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -66.5% | -52.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | -3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.0% | 7.6% |
| Q1 26 | 23.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -4.9% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.3% | -2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | -52.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -185.4% | -34.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -52.5% | -47.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.1% | -4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.3% | 7.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.74 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.22 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.24 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.44 | $-2.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.58 | $-1.34 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.49 | $-2.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.83 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.06 | $0.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $89.4M | $89.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $33.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $569.5M | $194.6M |
| Total Assets | $6.5B | $289.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.06× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $89.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.8M | $89.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $166.1M | $77.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $176.6M | $86.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $102.0M | $72.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.8M | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.9M | $89.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $124.6M | $108.9M |
| Q1 26 | $33.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $569.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $565.5M | $194.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $584.0M | $206.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $573.7M | $207.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $571.4M | $277.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $710.8M | $325.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $771.2M | $407.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $736.8M | $418.8M |
| Q1 26 | $6.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $289.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9B | $287.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | $304.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3B | $375.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $424.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.7B | $512.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7B | $510.9M |
| Q1 26 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $15.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $15.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $24.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $125.7M | $15.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.0M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.1M | $16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.7M | $659.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $176.5M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.5M | $-309.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.4M | $3.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $120.3M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.6M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.7M | $16.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.9M | $238.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $169.6M | $61.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.4M | $-575.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.9M | $3.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 140.6% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 96.9% | -6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.4% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 180.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.9% | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.9% | 2.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.58× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.33× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.28× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.22× | 0.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MSBI
| Net Interest Income | $57.4M | 72% |
| Noninterest Income | $22.1M | 28% |
RGP
| US | $93.7M | 80% |
| Non Us | $24.0M | 20% |
