vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) and NORTH EUROPEAN OIL ROYALTY TRUST (NRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8M vs $2.2M, roughly 1.7× NORTH EUROPEAN OIL ROYALTY TRUST). NORTH EUROPEAN OIL ROYALTY TRUST runs the higher net margin — 87.2% vs -117.1%, a 204.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. is a precious metals royalty and streaming firm focused on gold, silver, and strategic mineral assets primarily across North America. It partners with mining operators to earn stable, leveraged returns without incurring the high costs and operational risks of direct mine ownership, catering to investors seeking low-volatility exposure to precious metals markets.
North European Oil Royalty Trust is a publicly traded royalty trust holding overriding royalty interests in North Sea oil and gas producing properties. It earns revenue from its assets' production sales, distributing nearly all net income to unitholders regularly, with no active drilling or exploration operations.
MTA vs NRT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.8M | $2.2M |
| Net Profit | $-4.4M | $1.9M |
| Gross Margin | 50.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | -117.1% | 87.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 329.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 581.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | $519.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $981.0K | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | $285.5K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -102.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -176.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -121.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 87.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -117.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -151.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -138.0% | 55.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -120.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -138.2% | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $3.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | — |
| Total Assets | — | $3.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
