vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Metallus Inc. (MTUS) and Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($327.6M vs $267.3M, roughly 1.2× Metallus Inc.). Navios Maritime Partners L.P. runs the higher net margin — 21.4% vs -5.3%, a 26.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Metallus Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.1% vs -4.3%).
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. is a multinational, vertically integrated seaborne shipping and logistics company focused on the transport and transshipment of drybulk commodities including iron ore, coal and grain.
MTUS vs NMM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $267.3M | $327.6M |
| Net Profit | $-14.3M | $69.9M |
| Gross Margin | 2.2% | 90.5% |
| Operating Margin | -7.7% | — |
| Net Margin | -5.3% | 21.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.1% | -4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 33.2% | -31.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.34 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $267.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $305.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $304.6M | $327.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $280.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $240.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $294.7M | $342.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-14.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $69.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6M | $101.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.6% | 90.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | 88.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 29.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.46 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.52 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $156.7M | $377.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $686.0M | — |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $5.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $156.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $190.8M | $377.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $180.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $240.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $254.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $272.8M | $272.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $278.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $686.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $697.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $690.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $686.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $690.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $712.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $736.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $739.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $5.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.02× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-37.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -13.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-93.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-38.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-37.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-66.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -23.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.92× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.80× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.39× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MTUS
| Industrial Market Sector | $95.3M | 36% |
| Manufactured Components | $67.8M | 25% |
| Aerospace And Defense | $39.6M | 15% |
| Seamless Mechanical Tubing | $31.3M | 12% |
| Energy Market Sector | $18.3M | 7% |
| Other | $11.3M | 4% |
| Other Market Sector | $3.7M | 1% |
NMM
Segment breakdown not available.
