vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Metallus Inc. (MTUS) and ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd (OSW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Metallus Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($308.3M vs $242.1M, roughly 1.3× ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd). ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs 1.8%, a 3.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 9.9%). Over the past eight quarters, ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd's revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs 2.3%).
MTUS vs OSW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $308.3M | $242.1M |
| Net Profit | $5.4M | $12.1M |
| Gross Margin | 8.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 6.8% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.9% | 11.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 315.4% | -16.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $308.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $267.3M | $242.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $305.9M | $258.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $304.6M | $240.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $280.5M | $219.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $240.5M | $217.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.2M | $241.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $294.7M | $224.9M |
| Q1 26 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-14.3M | $12.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $19.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | $15.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.4M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.9M | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6M | $15.8M |
| Q1 26 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.7% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.1% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.1% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 8.4% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.3% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.9% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.6% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 7.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.46 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.13 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.15 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $104.0M | $16.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $84.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $683.0M | $542.6M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $707.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $104.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $156.7M | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.5M | $29.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $190.8M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $180.3M | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $240.7M | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $254.6M | $48.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $272.8M | $62.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $84.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | $85.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $96.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | $97.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4M | $98.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.2M | $98.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.2M | $123.8M |
| Q1 26 | $683.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $686.0M | $542.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $697.7M | $552.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $690.0M | $548.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $686.1M | $530.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $690.5M | $554.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $712.7M | $540.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $736.3M | $532.7M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $707.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $732.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $731.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $708.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $746.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $734.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $756.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 0.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | 0.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.02× | 0.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.02× | 0.23× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $20.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $14.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $68.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.0M | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.8M | $20.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-38.9M | $10.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.9M | $16.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.3M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3M | $18.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-37.2M | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.4M | $27.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.0M | $17.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-66.4M | $8.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.9M | $27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.8M | $17.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.6% | 7.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -23.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.5% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.5% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.0% | 7.8% |
| Q1 26 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.8% | 0.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.72× | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.41× | 1.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.92× | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.80× | 1.19× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MTUS
Segment breakdown not available.
OSW
| Services | $197.3M | 82% |
| Products | $44.8M | 18% |
