vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Metallus Inc. (MTUS) and POWER SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. (PSIX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Metallus Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($267.3M vs $191.2M, roughly 1.4× POWER SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC.). POWER SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. runs the higher net margin — 8.4% vs -5.3%, a 13.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, POWER SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.5% vs 11.1%). POWER SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-7.6M vs $-37.2M). Over the past eight quarters, POWER SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (41.7% CAGR vs -8.8%).
Adani Energy Solutions Ltd, formerly known as Adani Transmission Ltd, is an electric power transmission and distribution company headquartered in Ahmedabad. As of April 2025, the company operates a cumulative transmission network of 26,696 circuit kilometers and is one of the largest private sector power transmission companies operating in India.
MTUS vs PSIX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $267.3M | $191.2M |
| Net Profit | $-14.3M | $16.1M |
| Gross Margin | 2.2% | 21.9% |
| Operating Margin | -7.7% | 12.7% |
| Net Margin | -5.3% | 8.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.1% | 32.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 33.2% | -31.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.34 | $0.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $267.3M | $191.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $305.9M | $203.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $304.6M | $191.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $280.5M | $135.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $240.5M | $144.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.2M | $125.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $294.7M | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.6M | $95.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-14.3M | $16.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1M | $27.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $51.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | $19.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.4M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.9M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.0M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.4% | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.6% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 29.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | 28.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | 31.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.7% | 27.0% |
| Q4 25 | -7.7% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 18.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.1% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.1% | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.3% | 11.2% |
| Q4 25 | -5.3% | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.9% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.6% | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | 7.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | $0.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | $1.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | $2.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $0.83 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.46 | $1.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.13 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.52 | $0.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $156.7M | $41.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $96.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $686.0M | $178.6M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $424.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.54× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $156.7M | $41.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.5M | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $190.8M | $49.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $180.3M | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $240.7M | $55.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $254.6M | $40.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $272.8M | $28.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $278.1M | $33.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $96.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | $96.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4M | $184.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.2M | $238.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.2M | $292.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.2M | $345.0K |
| Q4 25 | $686.0M | $178.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $697.7M | $162.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $690.0M | $135.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $686.1M | $84.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $690.5M | $65.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $712.7M | $42.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $736.3M | $24.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $739.3M | $3.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $424.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $458.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $437.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $372.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $328.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $339.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $307.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $286.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 0.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | 0.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.02× | 0.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.02× | 0.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.02× | 0.11× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.9M | $-4.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-37.2M | $-7.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -13.9% | -4.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.2% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-93.0M | $14.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.0M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.8M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-38.9M | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.9M | $32.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.3M | $12.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3M | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.4M | $15.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-37.2M | $-7.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.4M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.0M | $14.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-66.4M | $5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | $30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.9M | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.8M | $822.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.0M | $14.8M |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | -4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -23.7% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.5% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.5% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.0% | 15.6% |
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.72× | 0.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.41× | 0.33× | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.92× | 0.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.80× | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.39× | 2.20× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MTUS
| Industrial Market Sector | $95.3M | 36% |
| Manufactured Components | $67.8M | 25% |
| Aerospace And Defense | $39.6M | 15% |
| Seamless Mechanical Tubing | $31.3M | 12% |
| Energy Market Sector | $18.3M | 7% |
| Other | $11.3M | 4% |
| Other Market Sector | $3.7M | 1% |
PSIX
| Energy End Market | $153.4M | 80% |
| Industrial End Market | $33.3M | 17% |
| Transportation End Market | $4.6M | 2% |
