vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Marwynn Holdings, Inc. (MWYN) and TDH Holdings, Inc. (PETZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Marwynn Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.3M vs $1.5M, roughly 1.6× TDH Holdings, Inc.). TDH Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -90.1% vs -116.0%, a 25.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Marwynn Holdings, Inc. is a Canada-based investment holding company focused on acquiring, managing, and scaling middle-market businesses primarily across North America. Its core operating segments cover industrial products, consumer goods, and technology-enabled services, targeting sustainable long-term value creation for its stakeholders.
TDH Holdings, Inc. is a pet product enterprise that develops, manufactures and distributes a comprehensive portfolio of pet food, nutritional treats, and daily pet supplies for dogs and cats. Its primary market is mainland China, catering to both online e-commerce and offline physical retail customer segments.
MWYN vs PETZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2023
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3M | $1.5M |
| Net Profit | $-2.7M | $-1.3M |
| Gross Margin | 42.4% | 27.5% |
| Operating Margin | -115.8% | -149.8% |
| Net Margin | -116.0% | -90.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -11713.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.16 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $623.7K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $1.5M |
| Q3 25 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.4K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-1.3M |
| Q3 25 | 42.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.2% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 27.5% |
| Q3 25 | -115.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -149.8% |
| Q3 25 | -116.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -90.1% |
| Q3 25 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $31.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3M | $21.2M |
| Total Assets | $11.6M | $36.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $480 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $31.8M |
| Q3 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $21.2M |
| Q3 25 | $11.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $36.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-95.1K | $-581.1K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-95.1K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-581.1K |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MWYN
| Other | $1.3M | 57% |
| Revenue From Recyclable Ewaste Materials Sales | $1.0M | 43% |
PETZ
Segment breakdown not available.
