vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX) and NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NETSTREIT Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($57.1M vs $40.6M, roughly 1.4× MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp). NETSTREIT Corp. runs the higher net margin — 10.0% vs -19.9%, a 29.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NETSTREIT Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.3% vs -20.7%). Over the past eight quarters, NETSTREIT Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (20.1% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
NETSTREIT Corp. is a US-headquartered real estate investment trust (REIT) that specializes in acquiring and operating a diversified portfolio of single-tenant net lease commercial properties. Its asset portfolio covers retail, industrial and office categories, primarily catering to investment-grade corporate tenants across the United States market.
MX vs NTST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $40.6M | $57.1M |
| Net Profit | $-8.1M | $5.7M |
| Gross Margin | 9.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -26.1% | 34.1% |
| Net Margin | -19.9% | 10.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -20.7% | 24.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.4% | 235.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.23 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $57.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $40.6M | $52.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.9M | $48.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.6M | $48.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $45.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.2M | $44.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.4M | $41.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.4M | $39.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-8.1M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.1M | $618.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.0K | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.9M | $1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.3M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.6M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.0M | $-2.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -26.1% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -25.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.6% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.1% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.5% | -12.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.1% | -12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.3% | -5.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -19.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.5% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -19.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -31.8% | -12.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.3% | -12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -28.0% | -5.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.23 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.36 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.24 | $0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.44 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.26 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.34 | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $248.3M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $351.5M | $2.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $926.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $913.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $868.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $778.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $726.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $248.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $269.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $299.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.8M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $351.5M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $359.6M | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $370.5M | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $373.9M | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.3M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $411.4M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $412.7M | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.76× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.55× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-54.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $109.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.0K | $28.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.1M | $30.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $22.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $90.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.9M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | $25.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-4.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-37.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -11.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -28.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 82.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 45.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.81× | 9.36× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.06× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
NTST
| Rental revenue (including reimbursable) | $54.0M | 95% |
| Other | $3.0M | 5% |
