vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX) and Orange County Bancorp, Inc. (OBT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($40.6M vs $33.0M, roughly 1.2× Orange County Bancorp, Inc.). Orange County Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 37.6% vs -19.9%, a 57.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Orange County Bancorp, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.6% vs -20.7%). Orange County Bancorp, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($41.3M vs $-4.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Orange County Bancorp, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (14.3% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
Orange County Bancorp, Inc. is a Delaware-registered bank holding company operating mainly in New York, U.S. It offers a full range of retail and commercial banking services, including deposit accounts, loans and wealth management solutions, serving individual consumers, small and mid-sized corporate clients in its regional footprint.
MX vs OBT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $40.6M | $33.0M |
| Net Profit | $-8.1M | $12.4M |
| Gross Margin | 9.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -26.1% | 41.4% |
| Net Margin | -19.9% | 37.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -20.7% | 20.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.4% | 73.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.23 | $0.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $40.6M | $33.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.9M | $33.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.6M | $32.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $28.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.2M | $27.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.4M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.4M | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.4M | $25.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.1M | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.1M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.0K | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.9M | $8.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.3M | $7.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.6M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.0M | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.4M | $9.3M |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -26.1% | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -25.1% | 38.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.6% | 41.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.1% | 40.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.5% | 32.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.1% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.3% | 36.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.6% | 45.9% |
| Q4 25 | -19.9% | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.5% | 29.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 32.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -19.9% | 31.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -31.8% | 26.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.3% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -28.0% | 29.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.5% | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.23 | $0.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.36 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.24 | $0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.44 | $0.64 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.26 | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.34 | $0.73 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.40 | $0.82 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $248.3M | $284.4M |
| Total Assets | $351.5M | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $171.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $248.3M | $284.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.3M | $270.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.2M | $252.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $269.2M | $201.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.8M | $185.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $299.6M | $193.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.8M | $177.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.9M | $168.7M |
| Q4 25 | $351.5M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $359.6M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $370.5M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $373.9M | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.3M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $411.4M | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $412.7M | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.2M | $2.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.4M | $43.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.8M | $41.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.9% | 125.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.3% | 7.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-54.2M | $69.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.0K | $30.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.1M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $34.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.9M | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | $9.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.8M | $41.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.5M | $29.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-37.0M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $32.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.5M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | $9.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.6M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | -11.9% | 125.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.3% | 87.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.7% | -17.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.9% | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 120.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -28.0% | 36.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.3% | 32.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.7% | 7.9% |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.01× | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.81× | -0.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.24× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
OBT
Segment breakdown not available.
