vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX) and Owlet, Inc. (OWLT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($40.6M vs $26.6M, roughly 1.5× Owlet, Inc.). MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp runs the higher net margin — -19.9% vs -34.6%, a 14.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Owlet, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (29.6% vs -20.7%). Owlet, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-651.0K vs $-4.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Owlet, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (34.2% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
Owlet, Inc. is a pediatric health technology firm that develops smart wearable monitoring products for infants, most notably its signature smart sock that tracks real-time heart rate, oxygen levels, and sleep metrics. It serves global consumer markets across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, distributing products via direct-to-consumer e-commerce and partnered retail outlets, focused on supporting parental peace of mind and infant health safety.
MX vs OWLT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $40.6M | $26.6M |
| Net Profit | $-8.1M | $-9.2M |
| Gross Margin | 9.3% | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | -26.1% | -18.4% |
| Net Margin | -19.9% | -34.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -20.7% | 29.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.4% | -1.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.23 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $40.6M | $26.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.9M | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.6M | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $21.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.2M | $20.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.4M | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.4M | $20.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.4M | $14.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.1M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.1M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.0K | $-37.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.9M | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.3M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.6M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.0M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.4M | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 47.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | 50.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | 51.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | 53.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.7% | 53.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | 52.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.1% | 49.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.6% | 44.4% |
| Q4 25 | -26.1% | -18.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -25.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.6% | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.1% | -12.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.5% | -36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.1% | -21.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.3% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.6% | -39.0% |
| Q4 25 | -19.9% | -34.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.5% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | -144.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -19.9% | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -31.8% | -44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.3% | -25.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -28.0% | -5.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.5% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $-2.37 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.24 | $0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.44 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.26 | $-0.61 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.34 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.40 | $-0.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.8M | $35.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $248.3M | $19.0M |
| Total Assets | $351.5M | $85.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | $35.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.0M | $23.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.3M | $21.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.7M | $16.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.6M | $20.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.1M | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.5M | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $171.6M | $18.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $248.3M | $19.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.3M | $-54.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.2M | $-59.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $269.2M | $-25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.8M | $-29.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $299.6M | $-21.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.8M | $-33.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.9M | $-32.9M |
| Q4 25 | $351.5M | $85.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $359.6M | $74.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $370.5M | $63.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $373.9M | $51.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.3M | $49.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $411.4M | $56.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $412.7M | $45.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.2M | $43.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.4M | $-452.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.8M | $-651.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.9% | -2.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.3% | 0.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-54.2M | $-11.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $-452.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.0K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.1M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.9M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $-3.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.8M | $-651.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.5M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-37.0M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.5M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | -11.9% | -2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.3% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.7% | -8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.9% | -28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -28.0% | -33.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.3% | -16.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.9% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.96× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.03× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
OWLT
| US | $22.7M | 85% |
| Non Us | $3.2M | 12% |
| Other | $651.0K | 2% |
