vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX) and PLUMAS BANCORP (PLBC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($40.6M vs $28.6M, roughly 1.4× PLUMAS BANCORP). On growth, PLUMAS BANCORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.1% vs -20.7%). PLUMAS BANCORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($20.3M vs $-4.8M). Over the past eight quarters, PLUMAS BANCORP's revenue compounded faster (20.8% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
Plumas Bancorp is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating through its subsidiary Plumas Bank. It provides full-spectrum retail and commercial banking services including deposit products, consumer and commercial loans, small business financing, and wealth management for individual customers, SMEs and local community groups across northern California and Nevada.
MX vs PLBC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $40.6M | $28.6M |
| Net Profit | $-8.1M | — |
| Gross Margin | 9.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -26.1% | 48.9% |
| Net Margin | -19.9% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -20.7% | 35.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.23 | $1.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $40.6M | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.9M | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.6M | $20.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $21.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.2M | $21.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.4M | $21.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.4M | $20.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.4M | $19.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.1M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.0K | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.9M | $7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.6M | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.0M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.4M | $6.3M |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -26.1% | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -25.1% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.6% | 42.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.1% | 46.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.5% | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.1% | 50.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.3% | 45.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.6% | 42.8% |
| Q4 25 | -19.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.5% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 30.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -19.9% | 33.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -31.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.3% | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -28.0% | 32.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.5% | 31.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.23 | $1.56 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.36 | $0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $1.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.24 | $1.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.44 | $1.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.26 | $1.31 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.34 | $1.14 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.40 | $1.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.8M | $80.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $248.3M | $261.1M |
| Total Assets | $351.5M | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | $80.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.0M | $87.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.3M | $79.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.7M | $87.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.6M | $82.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.1M | $118.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.5M | $109.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $171.6M | $128.2M |
| Q4 25 | $248.3M | $261.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.3M | $245.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.2M | $193.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $269.2M | $187.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.8M | $177.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $299.6M | $181.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.8M | $165.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.9M | $161.5M |
| Q4 25 | $351.5M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $359.6M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $370.5M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $373.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $411.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $412.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.2M | $1.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.4M | $21.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.8M | $20.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.9% | 70.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.3% | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-54.2M | $34.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.0K | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.1M | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $7.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.9M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $9.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.8M | $20.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.5M | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-37.0M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $29.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.5M | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.6M | $9.0M |
| Q4 25 | -11.9% | 70.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.3% | 17.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.7% | 9.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.9% | 33.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 141.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -28.0% | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.3% | 23.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.7% | 45.8% |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.9% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.81× | 0.33× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
PLBC
Segment breakdown not available.
