vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX) and Neuronetics, Inc. (STIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Neuronetics, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($41.8M vs $40.6M, roughly 1.0× MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp). Neuronetics, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -17.2% vs -19.9%, a 2.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Neuronetics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (85.7% vs -20.7%). Neuronetics, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($692.0K vs $-4.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Neuronetics, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (54.9% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
Neuronetics is a Malvern, PA based, publicly traded company incorporated in Delaware in April 2003, that develops non-invasive treatments for psychiatric disorders that have shown resistance or lack of improvement using traditional medicine. The treatments are based upon neuromodulation technology.
MX vs STIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $40.6M | $41.8M |
| Net Profit | $-8.1M | $-7.2M |
| Gross Margin | 9.3% | 52.0% |
| Operating Margin | -26.1% | -12.1% |
| Net Margin | -19.9% | -17.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -20.7% | 85.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.4% | 43.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.23 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $40.6M | $41.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.9M | $37.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.6M | $38.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $32.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.2M | $22.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.4M | $18.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.4M | $16.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.4M | $17.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.1M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.1M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.0K | $-10.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.9M | $-12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.3M | $-12.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.6M | $-13.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.0M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.4M | $-7.9M |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 52.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | 45.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | 46.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | 49.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.7% | 66.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | 75.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.1% | 74.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.6% | 75.1% |
| Q4 25 | -26.1% | -12.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -25.1% | -19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.6% | -21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.1% | -34.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.5% | -51.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.1% | -41.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.3% | -51.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.6% | -39.4% |
| Q4 25 | -19.9% | -17.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.5% | -24.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | -26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -19.9% | -39.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -31.8% | -56.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.3% | -72.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -28.0% | -59.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.5% | -45.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.23 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.24 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.44 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.26 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.34 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.40 | $-0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.8M | $28.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $65.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $248.3M | $22.4M |
| Total Assets | $351.5M | $141.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 2.94× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | $28.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.0M | $28.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.3M | $11.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.7M | $20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.6M | $18.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.1M | $20.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.5M | $42.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $171.6M | $47.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $65.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $65.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $55.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $55.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $55.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $46.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $59.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $59.4M |
| Q4 25 | $248.3M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.3M | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.2M | $27.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $269.2M | $35.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.8M | $27.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $299.6M | $9.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.8M | $19.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.9M | $27.7M |
| Q4 25 | $351.5M | $141.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $359.6M | $145.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $370.5M | $134.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $373.9M | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.3M | $140.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $411.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $412.7M | $96.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.2M | $103.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.08× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.15× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.4M | $908.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.8M | $692.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.9% | 1.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.3% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-54.2M | $-21.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $908.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.0K | $-785.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.1M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $-8.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.9M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $-12.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.8M | $692.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.5M | $-899.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-37.0M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | $-17.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $-8.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.5M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.6M | $-12.4M |
| Q4 25 | -11.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.3% | -2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.7% | -9.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.9% | -53.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | -38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -28.0% | -31.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.3% | -34.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.7% | -71.1% |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 2.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
STIM
Segment breakdown not available.
