vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX) and Target Hospitality Corp. (TH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Target Hospitality Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($73.5M vs $40.6M, roughly 1.8× MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp). MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp runs the higher net margin — -19.9% vs -20.3%, a 0.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Target Hospitality Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (22.0% vs -20.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Target Hospitality Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (0.7% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
Target Hospitality is a company that provides workforce lodging and other temporary, modular housing used for oil, gas and mining operations; large-scale events; and disaster relief. Target Hospitality is based in The Woodlands, Texas, and also has offices in Williston, North Dakota; Denver, Colorado; Calgary, Alberta.
MX vs TH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $40.6M | $73.5M |
| Net Profit | $-8.1M | $-14.9M |
| Gross Margin | 9.3% | 9.6% |
| Operating Margin | -26.1% | -22.9% |
| Net Margin | -19.9% | -20.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -20.7% | 22.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.4% | -219.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.23 | $-0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $40.6M | $73.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.9M | $91.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.6M | $54.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $54.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.2M | $60.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.4M | $65.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.4M | $67.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.4M | $72.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.1M | $-14.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.1M | $-795.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.0K | $-14.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.9M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.3M | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.6M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.0M | $18.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.4M | $20.4M |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | -0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.7% | 61.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | 68.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.1% | 69.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.6% | 67.8% |
| Q4 25 | -26.1% | -22.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -25.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.6% | -30.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.1% | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.5% | 34.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.1% | 42.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.3% | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.6% | 42.0% |
| Q4 25 | -19.9% | -20.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.5% | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | -27.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -19.9% | -11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -31.8% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.3% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -28.0% | 27.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.5% | 28.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.23 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.24 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.44 | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.26 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.34 | $0.18 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.40 | $0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.8M | $8.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $248.3M | $389.3M |
| Total Assets | $351.5M | $530.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.0M | $30.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.3M | $19.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.7M | $34.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.6M | $190.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.1M | $177.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.5M | $154.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $171.6M | $124.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $26.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $42.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $994.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $179.9M |
| Q4 25 | $248.3M | $389.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.3M | $402.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.2M | $401.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $269.2M | $415.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.8M | $421.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $299.6M | $417.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.8M | $397.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.9M | $375.5M |
| Q4 25 | $351.5M | $530.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $359.6M | $541.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $370.5M | $533.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $373.9M | $562.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.3M | $725.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $411.4M | $709.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $412.7M | $697.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.2M | $687.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.48× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.4M | $5.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-54.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.0K | $53.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.1M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.9M | $31.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | $39.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $50.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-37.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | $-11.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | -11.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.9% | -21.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -28.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 28.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.57× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.13× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.48× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
TH
| Services | $40.9M | 56% |
| Hospitality And Facilities Services South | $32.6M | 44% |