vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX) and Entrada Therapeutics, Inc. (TRDA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($40.6M vs $20.6M, roughly 2.0× Entrada Therapeutics, Inc.). MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp runs the higher net margin — -19.9% vs -84.4%, a 64.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-20.7% vs -65.2%). MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-4.8M vs $-39.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Entrada Therapeutics, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (6.4% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
Entrada Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biotechnology firm developing transformative intracellular therapies for serious rare diseases and high-unmet-need disorders. Its pipeline covers neuromuscular, metabolic, and central nervous system segments, serving global patients via healthcare partnerships.
MX vs TRDA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $40.6M | $20.6M |
| Net Profit | $-8.1M | $-17.3M |
| Gross Margin | 9.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -26.1% | -106.0% |
| Net Margin | -19.9% | -84.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -20.7% | -65.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.4% | -173.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.23 | $-0.42 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $40.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $20.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.2M | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.4M | $19.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.4M | $94.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.4M | $59.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.9M | $-17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.3M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.6M | $-14.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.0M | $55.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.4M | $23.5M |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -26.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -25.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.1% | -106.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.5% | -15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.1% | -110.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.3% | 56.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.6% | 35.7% |
| Q4 25 | -19.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -19.9% | -84.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -31.8% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.3% | -71.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -28.0% | 58.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.5% | 39.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.36 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.24 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.44 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.26 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.34 | $1.55 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.40 | $0.68 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.8M | $67.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $248.3M | $417.3M |
| Total Assets | $351.5M | $486.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.7M | $67.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.6M | $101.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.1M | $78.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.5M | $185.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $171.6M | $68.4M |
| Q4 25 | $248.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $269.2M | $417.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.8M | $428.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $299.6M | $422.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.8M | $429.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.9M | $269.4M |
| Q4 25 | $351.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $359.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $370.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $373.9M | $486.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.3M | $526.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $411.4M | $554.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $412.7M | $582.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.2M | $510.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.4M | $-38.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.8M | $-39.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.9% | -192.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.3% | 5.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-54.2M | $-58.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $-38.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $-31.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.9M | $-24.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | $39.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $-25.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-37.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | $-39.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $-32.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.5M | $-24.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | $38.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.6M | $-26.4M |
| Q4 25 | -11.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.9% | -192.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | -86.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -28.0% | -127.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.3% | 41.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.7% | -44.6% |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -27.94× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.09× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
TRDA
Segment breakdown not available.
