vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX) and Voyager Technologies, Inc. (VOYG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($40.6M vs $35.2M, roughly 1.2× Voyager Technologies, Inc.). MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp runs the higher net margin — -19.9% vs -130.4%, a 110.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Voyager Technologies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.1% vs -20.7%). MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-4.8M vs $-66.8M).
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
MX vs VOYG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $40.6M | $35.2M |
| Net Profit | $-8.1M | $-45.9M |
| Gross Margin | 9.3% | -4.4% |
| Operating Margin | -26.1% | — |
| Net Margin | -19.9% | -130.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -20.7% | 2.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.4% | -64.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.23 | $-0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $35.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $40.6M | $46.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.9M | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.6M | $45.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-45.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-8.1M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.1M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.0K | $-31.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 21.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -26.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -25.1% | -60.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.6% | -52.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -130.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -19.9% | -70.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.5% | -41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | -68.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -31.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -28.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.75 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.23 | $-0.52 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.24 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.44 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.26 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.34 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.8M | $429.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $248.3M | $404.5M |
| Total Assets | $351.5M | $1.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $429.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | $491.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.0M | $413.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.3M | $468.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $404.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $248.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.3M | $590.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.2M | $554.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $269.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $299.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $351.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $359.6M | $727.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $370.5M | $685.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $373.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $411.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $412.7M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.4M | $-39.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.8M | $-66.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.9% | -189.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-54.2M | $-263.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-39.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $-60.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.0K | $-15.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.1M | $-30.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-66.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-4.8M | $-54.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.5M | $-53.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-37.0M | $-88.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -189.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -11.9% | -116.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.3% | -135.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.7% | -194.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -28.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | 97.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.9% | 126.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
VOYG
Segment breakdown not available.
