vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX) and Whitestone REIT (WSR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Whitestone REIT is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($43.9M vs $40.6M, roughly 1.1× MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp). Whitestone REIT runs the higher net margin — 52.0% vs -19.9%, a 71.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Whitestone REIT posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.5% vs -20.7%). Whitestone REIT produced more free cash flow last quarter ($50.5M vs $-4.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Whitestone REIT's revenue compounded faster (8.7% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
Whitestone REIT is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that acquires, owns, manages and redevelops open-air community shopping centers, primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the southwestern and southeastern United States. Its property portfolio is largely anchored by daily necessity, service-focused retail tenants that cater to regular local consumer demand.
MX vs WSR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $40.6M | $43.9M |
| Net Profit | $-8.1M | $22.8M |
| Gross Margin | 9.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -26.1% | 53.0% |
| Net Margin | -19.9% | 52.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -20.7% | 7.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.4% | 31.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.23 | $0.43 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $40.6M | $43.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.9M | $41.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.6M | $37.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $38.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.2M | $40.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.4M | $38.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.4M | $37.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.4M | $37.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.1M | $22.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.1M | $18.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.0K | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.9M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.3M | $17.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.6M | $7.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.0M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.4M | $9.3M |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -26.1% | 53.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -25.1% | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.6% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.1% | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.5% | 43.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.1% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.6% | 25.9% |
| Q4 25 | -19.9% | 52.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.5% | 44.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -19.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -31.8% | 42.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.3% | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -28.0% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.5% | 25.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.23 | $0.43 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.36 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.24 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.44 | $0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.26 | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.34 | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.40 | $0.18 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.8M | $4.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $649.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $248.3M | $458.1M |
| Total Assets | $351.5M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | $4.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.0M | $6.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.3M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.7M | $5.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.6M | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.1M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.5M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $171.6M | $6.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $649.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $632.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $248.3M | $458.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.3M | $439.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.2M | $427.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $269.2M | $431.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.8M | $438.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $299.6M | $419.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.8M | $418.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.9M | $421.6M |
| Q4 25 | $351.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $359.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $370.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $373.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $411.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $412.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.2M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.4M | $50.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.8M | $50.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.9% | 114.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.3% | 0.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.22× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-54.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $50.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.0K | $18.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.1M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $3.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $58.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.9M | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $11.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.8M | $50.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-37.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $58.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | -11.9% | 114.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 142.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -28.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.81× | 2.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.73× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.23× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
WSR
Segment breakdown not available.
