vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MAXCYTE, INC. (MXCT) and Twin Vee PowerCats, Co. (VEEE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MAXCYTE, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.8M vs $3.0M, roughly 1.6× Twin Vee PowerCats, Co.). Twin Vee PowerCats, Co. runs the higher net margin — -85.6% vs -200.5%, a 114.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Twin Vee PowerCats, Co. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (60.4% vs -20.9%). Twin Vee PowerCats, Co. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.9M vs $-2.9M). Over the past eight quarters, MAXCYTE, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (-7.4% CAGR vs -24.3%).
MaxCyte Inc. is a global biotechnology company focused on developing cell engineering platforms and enabling technologies for cell and gene therapy advancement. Its proprietary non-viral cell modification systems are widely used by pharmaceutical, biotech and life science research entities to develop immunotherapies, gene-edited treatments and next-generation biologic drugs from preclinical research through commercialization.
Twin Vee PowerCats Co. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance recreational power catamaran boats. The company offers a diverse lineup of catamaran models suited for leisure cruising, fishing, water sports, and commercial marine use, serving customers primarily across North America, with a growing distribution network in global coastal markets.
MXCT vs VEEE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8M | $3.0M |
| Net Profit | $-9.6M | $-2.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 3.7% |
| Operating Margin | -234.5% | -87.7% |
| Net Margin | -200.5% | -85.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -20.9% | 60.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.4% | -119.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-1.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.8M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8M | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-9.6M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.4M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.4M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.3M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.6M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.6M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.4M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.5M | $-2.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -57.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | -234.5% | -87.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -307.4% | -81.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -244.3% | -35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -214.1% | -46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -213.1% | -224.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -250.4% | -107.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -241.0% | -107.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -219.8% | -48.2% |
| Q4 25 | -200.5% | -85.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -269.7% | -80.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -212.2% | -34.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -178.7% | -44.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -175.0% | -62.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -205.9% | -103.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -188.8% | -104.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -170.6% | -44.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.12 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.12 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.51 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.11 | $-2.64 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.09 | $-3.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.0M | $1.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $499.9K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $171.5M | $13.5M |
| Total Assets | $202.5M | $16.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $103.0M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.7M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.6M | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.3M | $4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $154.5M | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.8M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.3M | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $157.5M | $17.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $499.9K |
| Q4 25 | $171.5M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $180.3M | $15.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $190.7M | $18.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $199.4M | $17.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $206.3M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $213.3M | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $221.3M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $226.4M | $22.3M |
| Q4 25 | $202.5M | $16.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $213.5M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $219.8M | $22.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $230.0M | $23.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.5M | $25.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $248.6M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $251.5M | $33.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $257.9M | $36.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.02× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.7M | $-1.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.9M | $-1.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -61.0% | -62.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.8% | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-36.2M | $-9.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.5M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.9M | $-745.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.4M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.8M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.4M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.8M | $-482.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-10.6M | $-1.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.9M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.8M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.4M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.1M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.0M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.8M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.1M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.4M | $-3.7M |
| Q4 25 | -61.0% | -62.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -168.5% | -91.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -179.2% | -30.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -262.3% | -71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -131.6% | -192.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -85.5% | -128.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -103.3% | -51.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -203.6% | -70.9% |
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.5% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | 14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.4% | 22.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 68.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.4% | 37.7% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MXCT
| Products | $4.2M | 87% |
| Other | $634.0K | 13% |
VEEE
Segment breakdown not available.
