vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MAXLINEAR, INC (MXL) and DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC (PLOW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($184.5M vs $137.2M, roughly 1.3× MAXLINEAR, INC). DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -32.9%, a 39.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MAXLINEAR, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.0% vs 28.6%). Over the past eight quarters, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (38.9% CAGR vs 22.1%).
MaxLinear, Inc. is an American electronic hardware company. Founded in 2003, it provides highly integrated radio-frequency (RF) analog and mixed-signal semiconductor products for broadband communications applications. It is a New York Stock Exchange-traded company.
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government...
MXL vs PLOW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $137.2M | $184.5M |
| Net Profit | $-45.1M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | 57.5% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | 30.0% | 10.5% |
| Net Margin | -32.9% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 43.0% | 28.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -203.0% | 62.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.52 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $137.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $136.4M | $184.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $126.5M | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.8M | $194.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.9M | $115.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.2M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.1M | $129.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.0M | $199.9M |
| Q1 26 | $-45.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-14.9M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-45.5M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.6M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-49.7M | $148.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-57.8M | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-75.8M | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-39.3M | $24.3M |
| Q1 26 | 57.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 57.6% | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.9% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.5% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.1% | 24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.6% | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.4% | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.6% | 30.7% |
| Q1 26 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -10.9% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -32.7% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.6% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -48.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -44.7% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -82.3% | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.4% | 18.2% |
| Q1 26 | -32.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -10.9% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -36.0% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.4% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -51.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -62.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -93.4% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -42.7% | 12.2% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.52 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.17 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.52 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.31 | $1.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.58 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.68 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.90 | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.47 | $1.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $61.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $123.8M | $144.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $454.2M | $281.4M |
| Total Assets | $771.3M | $626.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.27× | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $61.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $72.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $111.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $102.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $118.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $148.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $185.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $123.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $454.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $451.9M | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $464.7M | $275.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $488.3M | $273.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $493.2M | $258.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $516.3M | $264.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $556.9M | $260.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $617.3M | $236.7M |
| Q1 26 | $771.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $796.4M | $626.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $808.1M | $694.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $863.7M | $671.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $855.3M | $621.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $864.6M | $590.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $895.3M | $665.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $973.2M | $617.0M |
| Q1 26 | 0.27× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $95.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $92.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 7.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $63.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4M | $95.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.4M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-27.8M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-30.7M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.7M | $2.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7M | $92.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.3M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.4M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.0M | $70.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.9M | $-15.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.7M | $836.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.6% | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.0% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -32.6% | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.0% | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.2% | 0.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 0.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MXL
Segment breakdown not available.
PLOW
| Work Truck Solutions | $101.5M | 55% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $83.1M | 45% |
