vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MAXLINEAR, INC (MXL) and Smith Douglas Homes Corp. (SDHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Smith Douglas Homes Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($260.4M vs $137.2M, roughly 1.9× MAXLINEAR, INC). Smith Douglas Homes Corp. runs the higher net margin — 1.4% vs -32.9%, a 34.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MAXLINEAR, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.0% vs -9.4%). Over the past eight quarters, MAXLINEAR, INC's revenue compounded faster (22.1% CAGR vs 17.3%).
MaxLinear, Inc. is an American electronic hardware company. Founded in 2003, it provides highly integrated radio-frequency (RF) analog and mixed-signal semiconductor products for broadband communications applications. It is a New York Stock Exchange-traded company.
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (S&W) is an American firearm manufacturer headquartered in Maryville, Tennessee, United States.
MXL vs SDHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $137.2M | $260.4M |
| Net Profit | $-45.1M | $3.5M |
| Gross Margin | 57.5% | 19.9% |
| Operating Margin | 30.0% | 6.5% |
| Net Margin | -32.9% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 43.0% | -9.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -203.0% | -14.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.52 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $137.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $136.4M | $260.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $126.5M | $262.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.8M | $223.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.9M | $224.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.2M | $287.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.1M | $277.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.0M | $220.9M |
| Q1 26 | $-45.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-14.9M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-45.5M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.6M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-49.7M | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-57.8M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-75.8M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-39.3M | $3.6M |
| Q1 26 | 57.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 57.6% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.9% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.5% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.1% | 23.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.6% | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.4% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.6% | 26.7% |
| Q1 26 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -10.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -32.7% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.6% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -48.0% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -44.7% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -82.3% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.4% | 11.7% |
| Q1 26 | -32.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -10.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -36.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -51.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -62.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -93.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -42.7% | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.52 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.17 | $0.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.52 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.31 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.58 | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.68 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.90 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.47 | $0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $61.1M | $12.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $123.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $454.2M | $86.7M |
| Total Assets | $771.3M | $557.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.27× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $61.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $72.8M | $12.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $111.9M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.6M | $16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $102.8M | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $118.6M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $148.5M | $23.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $185.1M | $17.3M |
| Q1 26 | $123.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $454.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $451.9M | $86.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $464.7M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $488.3M | $80.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $493.2M | $76.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $516.3M | $73.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $556.9M | $68.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $617.3M | $62.1M |
| Q1 26 | $771.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $796.4M | $557.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $808.1M | $571.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $863.7M | $570.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $855.3M | $513.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $864.6M | $475.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $895.3M | $460.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $973.2M | $429.3M |
| Q1 26 | 0.27× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $9.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $8.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 3.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.77× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-36.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4M | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5M | $-28.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.4M | $-34.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-27.8M | $5.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-30.7M | $22.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.7M | $39.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7M | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4M | $21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.3M | $-31.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.4M | $-35.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.0M | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.9M | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.7M | $-2.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.6% | -13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.0% | -16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -32.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.0% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.2% | -1.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 1.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -13.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.28× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MXL
Segment breakdown not available.
SDHC
| Southeast | $164.7M | 63% |
| Central | $95.8M | 37% |
