vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of N-able, Inc. (NABL) and Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
N-able, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($130.3M vs $93.7M, roughly 1.4× Ranpak Holdings Corp.). On growth, N-able, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.8% vs 2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Ranpak Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs 7.0%).
Able UK is a British industrial services company specialising in decommissioning of ships and offshore installations.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
NABL vs PACK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $130.3M | $93.7M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | 76.2% | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | 10.2% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | 11.8% | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.04 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $130.3M | $93.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.7M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.2M | $77.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.2M | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.5M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.4M | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $113.7M | $72.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.2M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.8M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.5M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.5M | $-8.1M |
| Q4 25 | 76.2% | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.5% | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 78.1% | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 76.6% | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.0% | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 82.9% | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 84.0% | 43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 83.9% | 44.6% |
| Q4 25 | 10.2% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.8% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | -12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.5% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.0% | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.1% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.1% | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.2% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | -11.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.02 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.06 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.05 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.04 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $111.8M | $63.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $393.9M | $401.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $804.7M | $534.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.49× | 0.75× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $111.8M | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.4M | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.9M | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $94.1M | $65.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.2M | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.4M | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.5M | $65.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $139.2M | $55.1M |
| Q4 25 | $393.9M | $401.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $331.7M | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $332.1M | $403.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $332.6M | $405.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $333.1M | $406.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $333.6M | $403.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $334.1M | $396.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $334.5M | $396.7M |
| Q4 25 | $804.7M | $534.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $813.4M | $537.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $809.4M | $539.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $775.1M | $544.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $759.3M | $548.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $765.0M | $564.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $724.4M | $566.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $709.1M | $560.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | 0.49× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.41× | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.43× | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.44× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.44× | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.46× | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.47× | 0.71× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $25.3M | $19.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $20.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $75.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $25.3M | $19.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.2M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.7M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.0M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.3M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $20.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $746.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.04× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.89× | 3.56× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.56× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NABL
| Transferred Over Time | $121.9M | 94% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $8.4M | 6% |
| Other Revenue | $1.3M | 1% |
PACK
| Other | $47.9M | 51% |
| Europe And Asia Segment | $45.8M | 49% |
