vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of N-able, Inc. (NABL) and RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
N-able, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($130.3M vs $71.1M, roughly 1.8× RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.). On growth, N-able, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.8% vs -1.8%). RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($33.5M vs $20.9M). Over the past eight quarters, N-able, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.0% CAGR vs -4.7%).
Able UK is a British industrial services company specialising in decommissioning of ships and offshore installations.
RE/MAX is an international real estate franchise operating in over 100 countries and territories that, in 2015, had over 100,000 agents in 6,800 offices.
NABL vs RMAX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $130.3M | $71.1M |
| Net Profit | — | $1.4M |
| Gross Margin | 76.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.2% | 13.1% |
| Net Margin | — | 2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.8% | -1.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -75.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.04 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $130.3M | $71.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.7M | $73.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.2M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.2M | $74.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.5M | $72.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.4M | $78.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $78.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $113.7M | $78.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.2M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.8M | $966.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.5M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.5M | $-3.4M |
| Q4 25 | 76.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 78.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 76.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 82.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 84.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 83.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.2% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.8% | 25.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 19.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.7% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.5% | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.0% | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.1% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.1% | -2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | -4.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.04 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $111.8M | $118.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $393.9M | $432.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $804.7M | $452.4M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $582.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.49× | 0.96× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $111.8M | $118.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.4M | $107.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.9M | $94.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $94.1M | $89.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.2M | $96.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.4M | $83.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.5M | $66.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $139.2M | $82.1M |
| Q4 25 | $393.9M | $432.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $331.7M | $433.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $332.1M | $434.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $332.6M | $435.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $333.1M | $436.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $333.6M | $437.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $334.1M | $438.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $334.5M | $439.0M |
| Q4 25 | $804.7M | $452.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $813.4M | $448.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $809.4M | $442.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $775.1M | $433.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $759.3M | $429.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $765.0M | $423.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $724.4M | $418.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $709.1M | $412.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $582.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $582.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $574.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $571.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $581.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $578.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $571.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $566.7M |
| Q4 25 | 0.49× | 0.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | 0.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.41× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.43× | 1.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.44× | 1.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.44× | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.46× | 1.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.47× | 1.07× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $25.3M | $40.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $20.9M | $33.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | 47.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 10.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 28.39× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $75.1M | $56.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $25.3M | $40.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $17.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.2M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.7M | $5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.0M | $59.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.3M | $15.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2M | $9.4M |
| Q4 25 | $20.9M | $33.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.4M | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.4M | $4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.8M | $53.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.2M | $16.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.0M | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $746.0K | $6.8M |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 47.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.9% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.2% | 73.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.1% | 17.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 8.6% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.39× | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.36× | 4.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.04× | 18.22× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.89× | 4.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.56× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NABL
| Transferred Over Time | $121.9M | 94% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $8.4M | 6% |
| Other Revenue | $1.3M | 1% |
RMAX
| Franchising Segment | $50.1M | 70% |
| Broker Fees | $13.9M | 20% |
| Annual Dues | $7.4M | 10% |
