vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of N-able, Inc. (NABL) and WESBANCO INC (WSBC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WESBANCO INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($257.2M vs $130.3M, roughly 2.0× N-able, Inc.). Over the past eight quarters, WESBANCO INC's revenue compounded faster (31.9% CAGR vs 7.0%).
Able UK is a British industrial services company specialising in decommissioning of ships and offshore installations.
WesBanco, Inc., is a bank holding company headquartered in Wheeling, West Virginia, United States. It has over 200 branches in West Virginia, Ohio, Western Pennsylvania, Kentucky, Maryland, and Southern Indiana.
NABL vs WSBC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $130.3M | $257.2M |
| Net Profit | — | $88.6M |
| Gross Margin | 76.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.2% | — |
| Net Margin | — | 34.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 54.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.04 | $0.88 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $257.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $130.3M | $265.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.7M | $261.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.2M | $260.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.2M | $193.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.5M | $162.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.4M | $150.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $147.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $88.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $91.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0M | $57.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.2M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $49.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.8M | $37.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.5M | $28.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 76.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 78.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 76.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 82.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 84.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.2% | 43.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.8% | 39.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 27.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | -5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.7% | 38.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.5% | 29.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | 23.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 34.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 31.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.1% | 22.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.1% | -4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.2% | 24.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | 19.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.88 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.04 | $0.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $0.84 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.02 | $0.57 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | $0.72 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.06 | $0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.05 | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $111.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $393.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $804.7M | $4.1B |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $27.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.49× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $111.8M | $956.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $94.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.2M | $568.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.4M | $620.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.5M | $486.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $393.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $331.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $332.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $332.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $333.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $333.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $334.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $804.7M | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $813.4M | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $809.4M | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $775.1M | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $759.3M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $765.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $724.4M | $2.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $27.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $27.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $27.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $27.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $27.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.49× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.46× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $25.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $20.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $75.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $25.3M | $290.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $116.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.2M | $105.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.7M | $-26.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.0M | $211.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | $60.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.3M | $18.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.9M | $280.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.4M | $114.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $98.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.4M | $-30.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.8M | $200.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.2M | $56.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.0M | $17.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 105.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | 43.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.9% | -15.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.2% | 123.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | 37.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.1% | 11.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.36× | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.04× | 1.63× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.89× | 0.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NABL
| Transferred Over Time | $121.9M | 94% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $8.4M | 6% |
| Other Revenue | $1.3M | 1% |
WSBC
| Net Interest Income | $215.4M | 84% |
| Noninterest Income | $41.8M | 16% |