vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA) and Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Serve Robotics Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($881.5K vs $444.9K, roughly 2.0× Nakamoto Inc.). Nakamoto Inc. runs the higher net margin — 8374.2% vs -3888.1%, a 12262.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Serve Robotics Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (400.1% vs -26.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Serve Robotics Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-3.5% CAGR vs -26.7%).
Ecovacs Robotics is a Chinese technology company. It is best known for developing in-home robotic appliances. The company was founded in 1998 by Qian Dongqi and is headquartered in Suzhou, China. According to Global Asia, Ecovacs Robotics had more than 60% of the Chinese market for robots by 2013. In 2023, Nikkei Asia had reported that the market capitalisation of Ecovacs Robotics has grown to near $6.38 billion, which is "roughly 5 times" that of the market capitalisation of rivalling US bas...
NAKA vs SERV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $444.9K | $881.5K |
| Net Profit | $37.3M | $-34.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | -757.3% |
| Operating Margin | -41198.2% | -4572.1% |
| Net Margin | 8374.2% | -3888.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -26.3% | 400.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3820.2% | -161.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.68 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $444.9K | $881.5K | ||
| Q3 25 | $388.2K | $687.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $408.5K | $642.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $579.7K | $440.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | $603.9K | $176.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | $647.9K | $222.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $639.1K | $468.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $829.0K | $946.7K |
| Q4 25 | $37.3M | $-34.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-86.0M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.4M | $-20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0M | $-13.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.0M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.0M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.3M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-282.3K | $-9.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | -757.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -637.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -445.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -333.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -371.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -70.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 62.8% |
| Q4 25 | -41198.2% | -4572.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2680.4% | -5067.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -585.4% | -3527.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -179.7% | -3406.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -169.3% | -7701.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -162.0% | -3804.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -162.3% | -1828.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.6% | -814.6% |
| Q4 25 | 8374.2% | -3888.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -22162.2% | -4806.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -590.9% | -3247.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -179.1% | -3000.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -165.8% | -7441.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -156.5% | -3601.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -206.5% | -1931.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -34.1% | -954.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.68 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.42 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.35 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.17 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.18 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.26 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.06 | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $22.6M | $106.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $514.3M | $350.7M |
| Total Assets | $730.6M | $367.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $22.6M | $106.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.2M | $116.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $116.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $197.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $123.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6M | $50.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7M | $28.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $287.4K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.4K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $148.8K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $205.6K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $254.7K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $710.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $514.3M | $350.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $477.6M | $283.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.0M | $207.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | $210.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6M | $131.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5M | $56.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $28.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-383.1K | $-8.8M |
| Q4 25 | $730.6M | $367.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $692.4M | $299.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $214.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6M | $216.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $139.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3M | $61.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | $32.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $799.3K | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-23.5M | $-29.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-46.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -5234.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1872.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.63× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-117.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-23.5M | $-29.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.2M | $-25.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.9M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-865.1K | $-9.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.1M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.0M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-913.5K | $-5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-213.4K | $-4.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-46.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-36.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-22.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-12.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.1M | $-11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.0M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-224.6K | $-4.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | -5234.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -5314.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3426.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2934.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -511.2% | -6307.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -161.7% | -4529.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1396.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -27.1% | -431.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1872.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1649.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 940.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 785.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | 2755.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 2070.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 169.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | -0.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
