vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Namib Minerals (NAMM) and TRX GOLD Corp (TRX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Namib Minerals is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($41.9M vs $25.1M, roughly 1.7× TRX GOLD Corp).

Namib Minerals is a Namibia-based natural resources firm focused on exploration, development and extraction of high-demand mineral deposits including uranium, copper and lithium. It operates across licensed southern African sites, supplying raw materials to global clean energy, construction and electronics manufacturing sectors.

TRX Gold Corp is a mineral exploration and development firm primarily engaged in the identification, evaluation, and development of gold resource assets. It conducts most of its operations in East Africa, with core project holdings in Tanzania, targeting high-grade deposits to deliver sustainable production and stakeholder value.

NAMM vs TRX — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
NAMM
NAMM
1.7× larger
NAMM
$41.9M
$25.1M
TRX

Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
NAMM
NAMM
TRX
TRX
Revenue
$41.9M
$25.1M
Net Profit
$-496.0K
Gross Margin
45.7%
56.6%
Operating Margin
29.8%
Net Margin
-2.0%
Revenue YoY
100.5%
Net Profit YoY
-123.2%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.01

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
NAMM
NAMM
TRX
TRX
Q4 25
$25.1M
Q2 25
$41.9M
$12.5M
Q1 25
$9.1M
Q4 24
$12.5M
Q2 24
$10.1M
Q1 24
$8.0M
Q4 23
$9.4M
Q2 23
$9.3M
Net Profit
NAMM
NAMM
TRX
TRX
Q4 25
$-496.0K
Q2 25
$1.1M
Q1 25
$-1.9M
Q4 24
$2.1M
Q2 24
$-1.7M
Q1 24
$1.9M
Q4 23
$-39.0K
Q2 23
$-374.0K
Gross Margin
NAMM
NAMM
TRX
TRX
Q4 25
56.6%
Q2 25
45.7%
35.1%
Q1 25
23.5%
Q4 24
38.6%
Q2 24
42.9%
Q1 24
41.0%
Q4 23
39.5%
Q2 23
41.7%
Operating Margin
NAMM
NAMM
TRX
TRX
Q4 25
Q2 25
29.8%
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Q4 23
Q2 23
Net Margin
NAMM
NAMM
TRX
TRX
Q4 25
-2.0%
Q2 25
8.9%
Q1 25
-21.3%
Q4 24
17.1%
Q2 24
-16.3%
Q1 24
24.1%
Q4 23
-0.4%
Q2 23
-4.0%
EPS (diluted)
NAMM
NAMM
TRX
TRX
Q4 25
$-0.01
Q2 25
$0.00
Q1 25
$-0.01
Q4 24
$0.00
Q2 24
$-0.01
Q1 24
$0.00
Q4 23
$0.00
Q2 23
$0.00

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
NAMM
NAMM
TRX
TRX
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$9.2M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$74.5M
Total Assets
$129.6M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
NAMM
NAMM
TRX
TRX
Q4 25
$9.2M
Q2 25
$3.6M
Q1 25
$6.0M
Q4 24
$6.8M
Q2 24
$7.7M
Q1 24
$8.0M
Q4 23
$8.3M
Q2 23
$7.2M
Stockholders' Equity
NAMM
NAMM
TRX
TRX
Q4 25
$74.5M
Q2 25
$69.0M
Q1 25
$67.5M
Q4 24
$68.4M
Q2 24
$62.5M
Q1 24
$63.9M
Q4 23
$61.5M
Q2 23
$58.2M
Total Assets
NAMM
NAMM
TRX
TRX
Q4 25
$129.6M
Q2 25
$112.3M
Q1 25
$106.7M
Q4 24
$102.6M
Q2 24
$92.6M
Q1 24
$88.2M
Q4 23
$87.1M
Q2 23
$84.2M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
NAMM
NAMM
TRX
TRX
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$11.4M
$4.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$7.4M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
17.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
9.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
NAMM
NAMM
TRX
TRX
Q4 25
$4.0M
Q2 25
$11.4M
$3.4M
Q1 25
$2.0M
Q4 24
$2.4M
Q2 24
$3.1M
Q1 24
$1.0M
Q4 23
$5.1M
Q2 23
$3.2M
Free Cash Flow
NAMM
NAMM
TRX
TRX
Q4 25
Q2 25
$7.4M
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Q4 23
Q2 23
FCF Margin
NAMM
NAMM
TRX
TRX
Q4 25
Q2 25
17.6%
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Q4 23
Q2 23
Capex Intensity
NAMM
NAMM
TRX
TRX
Q4 25
Q2 25
9.6%
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Q4 23
Q2 23
Cash Conversion
NAMM
NAMM
TRX
TRX
Q4 25
Q2 25
3.10×
Q1 25
Q4 24
1.11×
Q2 24
Q1 24
0.54×
Q4 23
Q2 23

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons