vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of NewAmsterdam Pharma Co N.V. (NAMS) and Research Solutions, Inc. (RSSS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

NewAmsterdam Pharma Co N.V. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($19.1M vs $11.8M, roughly 1.6× Research Solutions, Inc.). Research Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.6% vs -90.7%, a 95.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NewAmsterdam Pharma Co N.V. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (740.1% vs -1.0%). Research Solutions, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.4M vs $-37.8M).

Kite Pharma, Inc. is an American biotechnology company that develops cancer immunotherapy products with a primary focus on genetically engineered autologous CAR T cell therapy - a cell-based therapy which relies on chimeric antigen receptors and T cells. Founded in 2009, and based in Santa Monica, California, it was acquired by Gilead Sciences in 2017.

Jacobs Solutions Inc. is an American international technical professional services firm based in Dallas. The company provides engineering, technical, professional, and construction services as well as scientific and specialty consulting for a broad range of clients globally, including companies, organizations, and government agencies. Jacobs has consistently ranked No. 1 on both Engineering News-Record (ENR)'s 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023 Top 500 Design Firms and Trenchless Technolo...

NAMS vs RSSS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
NAMS
NAMS
1.6× larger
NAMS
$19.1M
$11.8M
RSSS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
NAMS
NAMS
+741.1% gap
NAMS
740.1%
-1.0%
RSSS
Higher net margin
RSSS
RSSS
95.3% more per $
RSSS
4.6%
-90.7%
NAMS
More free cash flow
RSSS
RSSS
$39.1M more FCF
RSSS
$1.4M
$-37.8M
NAMS

Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026

Metric
NAMS
NAMS
RSSS
RSSS
Revenue
$19.1M
$11.8M
Net Profit
$-17.4M
$546.9K
Gross Margin
52.4%
Operating Margin
-186.1%
6.3%
Net Margin
-90.7%
4.6%
Revenue YoY
740.1%
-1.0%
Net Profit YoY
55.5%
127.6%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.15
$0.02

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
NAMS
NAMS
RSSS
RSSS
Q4 25
$11.8M
Q3 25
$12.3M
Q2 25
$19.1M
$12.4M
Q1 25
$12.7M
Q4 24
$12.8M
$11.9M
Q3 24
$29.1M
$12.0M
Q2 24
$12.1M
Q1 24
$12.1M
Net Profit
NAMS
NAMS
RSSS
RSSS
Q4 25
$546.9K
Q3 25
$749.4K
Q2 25
$-17.4M
$2.4M
Q1 25
$216.5K
Q4 24
$-92.2M
$-2.0M
Q3 24
$-16.6M
$669.0K
Q2 24
$-2.8M
Q1 24
$76.3K
Gross Margin
NAMS
NAMS
RSSS
RSSS
Q4 25
52.4%
Q3 25
50.6%
Q2 25
51.0%
Q1 25
49.5%
Q4 24
48.9%
Q3 24
47.9%
Q2 24
46.5%
Q1 24
45.2%
Operating Margin
NAMS
NAMS
RSSS
RSSS
Q4 25
6.3%
Q3 25
7.8%
Q2 25
-186.1%
9.7%
Q1 25
4.4%
Q4 24
-338.5%
0.8%
Q3 24
-85.9%
5.4%
Q2 24
5.5%
Q1 24
0.7%
Net Margin
NAMS
NAMS
RSSS
RSSS
Q4 25
4.6%
Q3 25
6.1%
Q2 25
-90.7%
19.0%
Q1 25
1.7%
Q4 24
-721.7%
-16.6%
Q3 24
-57.2%
5.6%
Q2 24
-23.3%
Q1 24
0.6%
EPS (diluted)
NAMS
NAMS
RSSS
RSSS
Q4 25
$0.02
Q3 25
$0.02
Q2 25
$-0.15
$0.08
Q1 25
$0.01
Q4 24
$-0.91
$-0.07
Q3 24
$-0.18
$0.02
Q2 24
$-0.09
Q1 24
$0.00

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
NAMS
NAMS
RSSS
RSSS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$739.2M
$12.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$778.5M
$17.2M
Total Assets
$815.1M
$44.2M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
NAMS
NAMS
RSSS
RSSS
Q4 25
$12.3M
Q3 25
$12.0M
Q2 25
$739.2M
$12.2M
Q1 25
$9.9M
Q4 24
$834.2M
$7.7M
Q3 24
$422.7M
$6.9M
Q2 24
$6.1M
Q1 24
$4.2M
Stockholders' Equity
NAMS
NAMS
RSSS
RSSS
Q4 25
$17.2M
Q3 25
$15.6M
Q2 25
$778.5M
$13.9M
Q1 25
$11.2M
Q4 24
$757.5M
$11.1M
Q3 24
$378.9M
$12.8M
Q2 24
$11.7M
Q1 24
$14.1M
Total Assets
NAMS
NAMS
RSSS
RSSS
Q4 25
$44.2M
Q3 25
$45.5M
Q2 25
$815.1M
$46.1M
Q1 25
$45.2M
Q4 24
$864.6M
$42.8M
Q3 24
$439.2M
$41.4M
Q2 24
$41.9M
Q1 24
$40.8M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
NAMS
NAMS
RSSS
RSSS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-37.7M
$1.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-37.8M
$1.4M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-197.2%
11.7%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.5%
0.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.53×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-119.7M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
NAMS
NAMS
RSSS
RSSS
Q4 25
$1.4M
Q3 25
$1.1M
Q2 25
$-37.7M
$2.3M
Q1 25
$2.9M
Q4 24
$-37.5M
$1.0M
Q3 24
$-12.5M
$843.1K
Q2 24
$2.0M
Q1 24
$2.0M
Free Cash Flow
NAMS
NAMS
RSSS
RSSS
Q4 25
$1.4M
Q3 25
$1.1M
Q2 25
$-37.8M
Q1 25
$2.9M
Q4 24
$-37.5M
Q3 24
$-12.6M
Q2 24
$1.9M
Q1 24
$2.0M
FCF Margin
NAMS
NAMS
RSSS
RSSS
Q4 25
11.7%
Q3 25
8.8%
Q2 25
-197.2%
Q1 25
22.8%
Q4 24
-293.5%
Q3 24
-43.2%
Q2 24
16.0%
Q1 24
16.6%
Capex Intensity
NAMS
NAMS
RSSS
RSSS
Q4 25
0.1%
Q3 25
0.1%
Q2 25
0.5%
Q1 25
0.0%
Q4 24
0.0%
Q3 24
0.3%
Q2 24
0.1%
Q1 24
0.0%
Cash Conversion
NAMS
NAMS
RSSS
RSSS
Q4 25
2.53×
Q3 25
1.48×
Q2 25
0.96×
Q1 25
13.36×
Q4 24
Q3 24
1.26×
Q2 24
Q1 24
26.43×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

NAMS
NAMS

Segment breakdown not available.

RSSS
RSSS

Transactions$6.6M56%
Platforms$5.2M44%

Related Comparisons