vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NATHANS FAMOUS, INC. (NATH) and NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP (NRP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($51.3M vs $34.3M, roughly 1.5× NATHANS FAMOUS, INC.). NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP runs the higher net margin — 78.5% vs 9.0%, a 69.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NATHANS FAMOUS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.9% vs -21.8%). Over the past eight quarters, NATHANS FAMOUS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (8.8% CAGR vs -8.3%).
Nathan's Famous, Inc., is an American company that operates a chain of fast-food restaurants specializing in hot dogs. The original Nathan's restaurant stands at the corner of Surf and Stillwell avenues in the Coney Island neighborhood of Brooklyn, New York City. Its restaurants are primarily in the Northeastern United States. The company's headquarters are at One Jericho Plaza in Jericho, part of Oyster Bay, New York.
Natural Resource Partners LP is a U.S.-headquartered master limited partnership that owns, manages and leases mineral reserve interests. Its asset portfolio covers coal, aggregates, industrial minerals and oil & gas, with operations primarily across North America, deriving most revenue from royalties paid by third-party resource extraction operators.
NATH vs NRP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $34.3M | $51.3M |
| Net Profit | $3.1M | $40.3M |
| Gross Margin | 32.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 14.9% | 83.7% |
| Net Margin | 9.0% | 78.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.9% | -21.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -31.2% | -28.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.75 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.8M | $51.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.5M | $61.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.1M | $50.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.8M | $54.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.0M | $65.6M |
| Q4 25 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | $40.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | $42.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0M | $38.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3M | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9M | $56.2M |
| Q4 25 | 32.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | 83.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.4% | 74.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.4% | 84.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.7% | 92.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.5% | 91.0% |
| Q4 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | 78.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.2% | 69.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | 76.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.7% | 84.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.5% | 85.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.75 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.26 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.16 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.03 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.10 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.47 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.27 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.95 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $24.5M | $30.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $48.7M | $138.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-15.3M | — |
| Total Assets | $50.9M | $772.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $24.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.8M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.7M | $30.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.2M | $30.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.0M | $32.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.0M | $11.0M |
| Q4 25 | $48.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.5M | $138.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.1M | $142.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.6M | $197.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $210.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.6M | $188.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-19.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-21.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-32.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $50.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.5M | $772.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.7M | $772.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | $772.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.5M | $789.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $48.9M | $772.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.8M | $34.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $5.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.87× | 0.86× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $22.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-220.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8M | $34.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6M | $66.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.8M | $54.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0M | $56.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4M | $71.5M |
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-335.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.95× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.02× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.60× | 0.86× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.81× | 1.55× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.63× | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.54× | 1.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.64× | 1.27× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NATH
| Branded Product Program | $23.7M | 69% |
| Product Licensing | $7.4M | 22% |
| Company Operated Restaurants | $1.6M | 5% |
| Franchise Fees And Royalties | $1.0M | 3% |
NRP
| Coal Royalty Revenues | $35.5M | 69% |
| Soda Ash Segment | $4.6M | 9% |
| Transportation And Processing Services | $4.4M | 9% |
| Production Lease Minimum Revenues | $2.7M | 5% |
| Oil And Gas Royalty Revenues | $2.4M | 5% |
| Other | $1.6M | 3% |
