vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NCR Atleos Corp (NATL) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Roper Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.8× NCR Atleos Corp). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 7.2%, a 8.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs 4.0%). Roper Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($507.0M vs $194.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Roper Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs 4.9%).
NCR Voyix Corporation, previously known as NCR Corporation and National Cash Register, is a global software, consulting and technology company providing several professional services and electronic products. It manufactured self-service kiosks, point-of-sale terminals, automated teller machines, check processing systems, and barcode scanners.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
NATL vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $83.0M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 13.5% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | 7.2% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.0% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 102.4% | 53.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.09 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $979.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $83.0M | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.0M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.0M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.0M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.0M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.0M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.5% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.4% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.2% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.09 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.52 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.19 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.56 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.28 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.37 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $456.0M | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.7B | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $403.0M | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $5.7B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 6.63× | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $456.0M | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $412.0M | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $357.0M | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $352.0M | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $419.0M | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $395.0M | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $374.0M | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $403.0M | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $330.0M | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $350.0M | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $275.0M | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $219.0M | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $264.0M | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $250.0M | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.7B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.8B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.63× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.45× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.05× | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $231.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $194.0M | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.8% | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.78× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $239.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $231.0M | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.0M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-23.0M | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $123.0M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.0M | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $107.0M | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0M | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $194.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-44.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $94.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $85.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.78× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.96× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.59× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.79× | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.95× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.10× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.33× | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NATL
| Services | $848.0M | 74% |
| APJ | $136.0M | 12% |
| Americas Excluding United States | $135.0M | 12% |
| TT | $44.0M | 4% |
ROP
Segment breakdown not available.
