vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of NATURES SUNSHINE PRODUCTS INC (NATR) and Portillo's Inc. (PTLO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Portillo's Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($185.7M vs $123.8M, roughly 1.5× NATURES SUNSHINE PRODUCTS INC). Portillo's Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs 3.3%, a 0.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NATURES SUNSHINE PRODUCTS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.7% vs 0.6%). NATURES SUNSHINE PRODUCTS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.6M vs $-9.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Portillo's Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5.8% CAGR vs 5.6%).

Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. also known as "NSP", is a manufacturer of dietary supplements, including herbs, vitamins, minerals, and personal care products. It is based in Lehi, Utah, with a manufacturing facility in Spanish Fork, Utah.

Portillo's Restaurant Group, Inc. is an American fast casual restaurant chain based in the Chicago area that specializes in serving Chicago-style food such as hot dogs, Maxwell Street Polish, and Italian beef. The company was founded by Dick Portillo on April 9, 1963, in Villa Park, Illinois, under the name "The Dog House".

NATR vs PTLO — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PTLO
PTLO
1.5× larger
PTLO
$185.7M
$123.8M
NATR
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
NATR
NATR
+4.1% gap
NATR
4.7%
0.6%
PTLO
Higher net margin
PTLO
PTLO
0.1% more per $
PTLO
3.4%
3.3%
NATR
More free cash flow
NATR
NATR
$16.7M more FCF
NATR
$7.6M
$-9.2M
PTLO
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
PTLO
PTLO
Annualised
PTLO
5.8%
5.6%
NATR

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
NATR
NATR
PTLO
PTLO
Revenue
$123.8M
$185.7M
Net Profit
$4.1M
$6.3M
Gross Margin
72.5%
Operating Margin
4.3%
5.6%
Net Margin
3.3%
3.4%
Revenue YoY
4.7%
0.6%
Net Profit YoY
1379.4%
-49.5%
EPS (diluted)
$0.23
$0.08

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
NATR
NATR
PTLO
PTLO
Q4 25
$123.8M
$185.7M
Q3 25
$128.3M
$181.4M
Q2 25
$114.8M
$188.5M
Q1 25
$113.2M
$176.4M
Q4 24
$118.2M
$184.6M
Q3 24
$114.6M
$178.3M
Q2 24
$110.6M
$181.9M
Q1 24
$111.0M
$165.8M
Net Profit
NATR
NATR
PTLO
PTLO
Q4 25
$4.1M
$6.3M
Q3 25
$5.3M
$1.2M
Q2 25
$5.3M
$8.7M
Q1 25
$4.7M
$3.3M
Q4 24
$-321.0K
$12.4M
Q3 24
$4.3M
$7.2M
Q2 24
$1.3M
$6.5M
Q1 24
$2.3M
$4.6M
Gross Margin
NATR
NATR
PTLO
PTLO
Q4 25
72.5%
Q3 25
73.3%
Q2 25
71.7%
Q1 25
72.1%
Q4 24
72.0%
Q3 24
71.3%
Q2 24
71.4%
Q1 24
71.2%
Operating Margin
NATR
NATR
PTLO
PTLO
Q4 25
4.3%
5.6%
Q3 25
7.0%
3.0%
Q2 25
3.7%
9.3%
Q1 25
5.4%
5.9%
Q4 24
3.8%
7.5%
Q3 24
4.6%
9.0%
Q2 24
5.1%
10.0%
Q1 24
4.2%
6.1%
Net Margin
NATR
NATR
PTLO
PTLO
Q4 25
3.3%
3.4%
Q3 25
4.2%
0.7%
Q2 25
4.6%
4.6%
Q1 25
4.2%
1.9%
Q4 24
-0.3%
6.7%
Q3 24
3.8%
4.1%
Q2 24
1.2%
3.6%
Q1 24
2.1%
2.8%
EPS (diluted)
NATR
NATR
PTLO
PTLO
Q4 25
$0.23
$0.08
Q3 25
$0.30
$0.02
Q2 25
$0.28
$0.12
Q1 25
$0.25
$0.05
Q4 24
$-0.02
$0.17
Q3 24
$0.23
$0.11
Q2 24
$0.07
$0.10
Q1 24
$0.12
$0.08

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
NATR
NATR
PTLO
PTLO
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$93.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$334.2M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$161.6M
$467.8M
Total Assets
$261.1M
$1.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.71×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
NATR
NATR
PTLO
PTLO
Q4 25
$93.9M
Q3 25
$95.6M
Q2 25
$81.3M
Q1 25
$86.5M
Q4 24
$84.7M
Q3 24
$78.7M
Q2 24
$68.7M
Q1 24
$77.8M
Total Debt
NATR
NATR
PTLO
PTLO
Q4 25
$334.2M
Q3 25
$322.6M
Q2 25
$317.0M
Q1 25
$319.8M
Q4 24
$311.7M
Q3 24
$302.2M
Q2 24
$305.1M
Q1 24
$2.1M
$321.7M
Stockholders' Equity
NATR
NATR
PTLO
PTLO
Q4 25
$161.6M
$467.8M
Q3 25
$166.7M
$459.4M
Q2 25
$163.7M
$458.9M
Q1 25
$167.1M
$406.9M
Q4 24
$161.0M
$401.1M
Q3 24
$162.6M
$382.4M
Q2 24
$156.4M
$370.2M
Q1 24
$159.7M
$360.5M
Total Assets
NATR
NATR
PTLO
PTLO
Q4 25
$261.1M
$1.6B
Q3 25
$264.8M
$1.6B
Q2 25
$254.9M
$1.6B
Q1 25
$252.7M
$1.5B
Q4 24
$240.9M
$1.5B
Q3 24
$245.3M
$1.5B
Q2 24
$235.8M
$1.4B
Q1 24
$247.3M
$1.4B
Debt / Equity
NATR
NATR
PTLO
PTLO
Q4 25
0.71×
Q3 25
0.70×
Q2 25
0.69×
Q1 25
0.79×
Q4 24
0.78×
Q3 24
0.79×
Q2 24
0.82×
Q1 24
0.01×
0.89×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
NATR
NATR
PTLO
PTLO
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$9.9M
$23.2M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$7.6M
$-9.2M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
6.1%
-4.9%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.9%
17.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.41×
3.69×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$28.8M
$-18.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
NATR
NATR
PTLO
PTLO
Q4 25
$9.9M
$23.2M
Q3 25
$18.5M
$20.0M
Q2 25
$4.3M
$19.2M
Q1 25
$2.6M
$9.4M
Q4 24
$12.2M
$26.1M
Q3 24
$9.6M
$30.3M
Q2 24
$1.3M
$32.6M
Q1 24
$2.2M
$9.1M
Free Cash Flow
NATR
NATR
PTLO
PTLO
Q4 25
$7.6M
$-9.2M
Q3 25
$16.8M
$-5.0M
Q2 25
$3.0M
$5.2M
Q1 25
$1.5M
$-9.6M
Q4 24
$10.0M
$-5.6M
Q3 24
$7.9M
$7.7M
Q2 24
$-2.0M
$15.6M
Q1 24
$-1.5M
$-7.9M
FCF Margin
NATR
NATR
PTLO
PTLO
Q4 25
6.1%
-4.9%
Q3 25
13.1%
-2.7%
Q2 25
2.6%
2.8%
Q1 25
1.3%
-5.4%
Q4 24
8.5%
-3.0%
Q3 24
6.9%
4.3%
Q2 24
-1.9%
8.6%
Q1 24
-1.4%
-4.7%
Capex Intensity
NATR
NATR
PTLO
PTLO
Q4 25
1.9%
17.4%
Q3 25
1.3%
13.8%
Q2 25
1.2%
7.5%
Q1 25
1.0%
10.8%
Q4 24
1.9%
17.2%
Q3 24
1.5%
12.7%
Q2 24
3.0%
9.3%
Q1 24
3.3%
10.2%
Cash Conversion
NATR
NATR
PTLO
PTLO
Q4 25
2.41×
3.69×
Q3 25
3.46×
16.51×
Q2 25
0.81×
2.21×
Q1 25
0.55×
2.85×
Q4 24
2.10×
Q3 24
2.21×
4.20×
Q2 24
0.97×
5.03×
Q1 24
0.94×
1.99×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

NATR
NATR

Other$68.1M55%
General Health Products$20.2M16%
Digestive Products$13.8M11%
Cardiovascular Products$12.1M10%
Personal Care Products$4.4M4%
Immunity Products$3.1M3%
Weight Management Products$2.1M2%

PTLO
PTLO

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons