vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NB Bancorp, Inc. (NBBK) and Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Latham Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($100.0M vs $63.4M, roughly 1.6× NB Bancorp, Inc.). NB Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 12.2% vs -7.0%, a 19.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NB Bancorp, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (33.9% vs 14.5%). NB Bancorp, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($57.4M vs $14.1M). Over the past eight quarters, NB Bancorp, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (22.6% CAGR vs -4.9%).
NB Bancorp, Inc. is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating through its fully owned banking subsidiary. It provides a full range of retail and commercial banking services including various deposit products, consumer loans, residential mortgages, and small business financing solutions, primarily catering to individual and small-to-mid-sized enterprise customers across the New York metropolitan area.
Latham & Watkins LLP is an American multinational law firm. Founded in 1934 in Los Angeles, California, it is known for its litigation, corporate, and regulatory law practices.
NBBK vs SWIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $63.4M | $100.0M |
| Net Profit | $7.7M | $-7.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 23.5% | -10.7% |
| Net Margin | 12.2% | -7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 33.9% | 14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -50.6% | 76.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $63.4M | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.7M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.2M | $172.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.4M | $111.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.3M | $87.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.6M | $150.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.7M | $160.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.1M | $110.6M |
| Q4 25 | $7.7M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.4M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.6M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.7M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.6M | $-29.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.5M | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.7M | $-7.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.7% |
| Q4 25 | 23.5% | -10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.6% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.6% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.1% | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.7% | -14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.1% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.3% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.8% | -1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 12.2% | -7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.7% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.5% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.7% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.0% | -33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.7% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.7% | -7.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.19 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.43 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.39 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.40 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.24 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.22 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $279.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $858.9M | $405.9M |
| Total Assets | $7.0B | $823.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $279.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $281.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $281.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $306.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $281.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $282.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $282.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $282.8M |
| Q4 25 | $858.9M | $405.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $737.0M | $408.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $737.1M | $398.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $739.6M | $381.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $765.2M | $387.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $747.4M | $416.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $734.3M | $408.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $733.8M | $391.8M |
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | $823.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | $844.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $822.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $824.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $794.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $853.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $830.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.7B | $808.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.72× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $60.8M | $23.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $57.4M | $14.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 90.6% | 14.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.4% | 9.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.89× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $117.2M | $38.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $60.8M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.2M | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.0M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.9M | $-46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.2M | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6M | $37.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.7M | $52.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.4M | $-34.5M |
| Q4 25 | $57.4M | $14.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.9M | $45.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.1M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.8M | $-50.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.3M | $-98.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.8M | $47.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.7M | $-39.9M |
| Q4 25 | 90.6% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.3% | 27.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.0% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.8% | -45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 87.2% | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.1% | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -27.7% | -36.0% |
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | 7.89× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.58× | 6.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 2.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.77× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | 6.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.61× | 3.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.31× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NBBK
Segment breakdown not available.
SWIM
| In Ground Swimming Pools | $50.2M | 50% |
| Covers | $37.0M | 37% |
| Liners | $12.7M | 13% |