vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) and UNITY BANCORP INC (UNTY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNITY BANCORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($35.3M vs $32.1M, roughly 1.1× Nebius Group N.V.). UNITY BANCORP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($44.3M vs $-586.8M).
Nebius Group N.V., headquartered in Amsterdam, is a technology company that provides artificial intelligence infrastructure. The company also owns Avride and TripleTen, as well as stakes in Toloka and Clickhouse. It is headquartered in Amsterdam with offices in Israel and the United States.
Unity Bancorp Inc is a New Jersey-headquartered financial holding company operating Unity Bank. It offers a full range of commercial and retail banking services including business loans, deposit products, mortgage services, and personal banking solutions, primarily serving small and medium-sized enterprises and individual consumers across local communities in New Jersey and eastern Pennsylvania.
NBIS vs UNTY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.1M | $35.3M |
| Net Profit | — | $15.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -251.1% | 55.8% |
| Net Margin | — | 43.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 24.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 34.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.52 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $35.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.1M | $32.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.2M | $34.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $29.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $28.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $27.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.3M | $25.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $25.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $15.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-185.4M | $16.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-258.2M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-118.3M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -251.1% | 57.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -754.1% | 62.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 52.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 51.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -366.1% | 52.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -563.1% | 49.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 50.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 43.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -766.1% | 48.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 40.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -324.4% | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -325.9% | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 37.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.52 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.61 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.92 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.94 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.8B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.8B | $345.6M |
| Total Assets | $10.1B | $3.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $230.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $345.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $334.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $319.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $306.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $295.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $284.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $273.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $266.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-196.8M | $44.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-586.8M | $44.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1828.0% | 125.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1215.0% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.90× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $81.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $44.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-196.8M | $45.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-162.0M | $-25.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $48.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-8.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $44.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-586.8M | $45.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-379.9M | $-25.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $47.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-8.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 125.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1828.0% | 138.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1569.8% | -74.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 59.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 166.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -33.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 61.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1215.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 900.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.90× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.16× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.54× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.17× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.89× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.64× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NBIS
| Nebius | $27.1M | 84% |
| TripleTen | $6.3M | 20% |
| Avride | $100.0K | 0% |
UNTY
Segment breakdown not available.
