vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NACCO INDUSTRIES INC (NC) and Vitesse Energy, Inc. (VTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NACCO INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($66.8M vs $58.6M, roughly 1.1× Vitesse Energy, Inc.). Vitesse Energy, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1.3% vs -5.8%, a 4.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vitesse Energy, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.8% vs -5.2%). Over the past eight quarters, NACCO INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (11.9% CAGR vs -2.1%).
NACCO Industries, Inc. is an American publicly traded holding company, headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio. Through a portfolio of mining and natural resources businesses, the company operates under three business segments: Coal Mining, North American Mining, and Minerals Management. The Coal Mining segment operates surface coal mines under long-term contracts with power generation companies and an activated carbon producer pursuant to a service-based business model. The North American Mining se...
Vitesse Energy, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered independent energy company focused on exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas assets. It operates primarily in high-potential onshore basins including North Dakota's Williston Basin, serving domestic and global upstream energy market demand.
NC vs VTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $66.8M | $58.6M |
| Net Profit | $-3.8M | $-739.0K |
| Gross Margin | 18.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.3% | -12.0% |
| Net Margin | -5.8% | -1.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.2% | 4.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -150.8% | 85.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.53 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $66.8M | $58.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.6M | $67.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $68.2M | $81.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.6M | $66.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.4M | $55.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.7M | $58.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.3M | $66.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.3M | $61.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | $-739.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.6M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.6M | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0M | $10.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6M | $-2.2M |
| Q4 25 | 18.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | -12.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.1% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.9% | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.1% | 25.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.9% | 21.4% |
| Q4 25 | -5.8% | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.3% | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.8% | 30.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.5% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.4% | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.4% | 16.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | -3.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.53 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.78 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.44 | $0.60 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.66 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.99 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.14 | $0.53 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.81 | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.61 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $49.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $100.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $429.2M | $629.3M |
| Total Assets | $661.2M | $893.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.23× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $49.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.9M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $72.8M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $100.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $99.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $429.2M | $629.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $426.4M | $650.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $413.1M | $671.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $409.1M | $667.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $404.9M | $500.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $397.3M | $520.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $384.1M | $518.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $381.6M | $522.7M |
| Q4 25 | $661.2M | $893.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $637.6M | $932.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $631.3M | $951.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $634.2M | $975.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $631.7M | $810.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $597.4M | $791.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.1M | $778.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $538.0M | $749.7M |
| Q4 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.07× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $11.4M | $37.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $11.4M | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.3M | $49.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.8M | $66.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0M | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.2M | $34.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8M | $45.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1M | $35.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.8M | $39.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.19× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.39× | 2.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.03× | 6.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.18× | 2.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.68× | 3.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.14× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NC
| Transferred Over Time | $42.7M | 64% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $24.1M | 36% |
VTS
| Oil Reserves | $54.5M | 93% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $4.2M | 7% |
