vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (NEN) and PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. (PACB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($44.6M vs $23.6M, roughly 1.9× NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP). PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. runs the higher net margin — -90.4% vs -677.3%, a 586.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs 13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP's revenue compounded faster (8.9% CAGR vs 7.3%).
New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership is a real estate investment entity that owns, operates and manages residential and commercial properties primarily across the U.S. New England region. Its core assets include multifamily apartments, mixed-use properties and small commercial spaces, serving tenants across Massachusetts, New Hampshire and adjacent states, delivering steady returns to unitholders via rental income and property value growth.
Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. is an American biotechnology company founded in 2004 that develops and manufactures systems for gene sequencing and some novel real time biological observation. PacBio has two principal sequencing platforms: single-molecule real-time sequencing (SMRT), based on the properties of zero-mode waveguides and sequencing by binding (SBB) chemistry, which uses native nucleotides and scarless incorporation for DNA binding and extension.
NEN vs PACB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.6M | $44.6M |
| Net Profit | $-1.4M | $-40.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.1% |
| Operating Margin | 14.0% | -92.3% |
| Net Margin | -677.3% | -90.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.7% | 13.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -133.0% | -1802.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $23.6M | $44.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $38.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.2M | $39.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.7M | $37.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.4M | $39.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.2M | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.1M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.9M | $38.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.4M | $-40.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-521.8K | $-38.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $-41.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8M | $-426.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | $-60.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1M | $-173.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5M | $-78.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 29.1% |
| Q4 25 | 14.0% | -92.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.0% | -101.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.3% | -112.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.1% | -1154.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.4% | -390.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.0% | -160.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.6% | -488.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.9% | -209.6% |
| Q4 25 | -677.3% | -90.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.2% | -98.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | -105.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | -1146.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.7% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.3% | -151.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | -481.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.4% | -201.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.22 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.64 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $26.7M | $279.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $531.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $5.3M |
| Total Assets | $505.3M | $784.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $26.7M | $279.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.4M | $298.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.7M | $314.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.9M | $343.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.6M | $389.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1M | $471.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.5M | $509.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.8M | $561.9M |
| Q4 25 | $531.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $514.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $514.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $407.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $408.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $409.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $410.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $410.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $36.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $61.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $91.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $506.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $453.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $492.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $649.0M |
| Q4 25 | $505.3M | $784.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $492.9M | $803.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $494.8M | $825.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $385.2M | $860.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $393.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $387.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $383.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $381.2M | $1.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $27.7M | $-19.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-19.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -44.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-114.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.7M | $-19.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3M | $-18.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.5M | $-29.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $-44.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.9M | $-30.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5M | $-45.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4M | $-54.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.1M | $-75.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-19.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-29.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-45.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-32.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-46.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-55.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-79.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -44.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -48.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -75.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -122.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -82.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -115.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -154.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -205.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.02× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.57× | -12.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.17× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.32× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.77× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NEN
Segment breakdown not available.
PACB
| Products | $39.0M | 87% |
| Service And Other | $5.7M | 13% |
