vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (NEN) and Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.6M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.8× Stabilis Solutions, Inc.). Stabilis Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -2.0% vs -677.3%, a 675.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs -23.3%). Over the past eight quarters, NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP's revenue compounded faster (8.9% CAGR vs -18.1%).
New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership is a real estate investment entity that owns, operates and manages residential and commercial properties primarily across the U.S. New England region. Its core assets include multifamily apartments, mixed-use properties and small commercial spaces, serving tenants across Massachusetts, New Hampshire and adjacent states, delivering steady returns to unitholders via rental income and property value growth.
Stabilis Solutions, Inc.SLNGEarnings & Financial Report
Stabilis Solutions, Inc. is a leading North American small-scale liquefied natural gas (LNG) producer and distributor. It supplies LNG fuel, cryogenic services, and full-cycle energy solutions to industrial, remote power, transportation, and commercial clients across the United States and Canada, advancing low-emission energy transition efforts.
NEN vs SLNG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.6M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $-1.4M | $-262.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 24.7% |
| Operating Margin | 14.0% | -2.4% |
| Net Margin | -677.3% | -2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.7% | -23.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -133.0% | -112.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $23.6M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $20.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.2M | $17.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.7M | $17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.4M | $17.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.2M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.1M | $18.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.9M | $19.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.4M | $-262.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-521.8K | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $-613.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2M | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | $997.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1M | $27.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5M | $1.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 26.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.6% |
| Q4 25 | 14.0% | -2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.3% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.1% | -9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.4% | 12.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.0% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.9% | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | -677.3% | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | -3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | -9.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.7% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.3% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.4% | 7.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $26.7M | $7.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $531.0M | $7.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $66.7M |
| Total Assets | $505.3M | $83.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.12× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $26.7M | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.4M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.7M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.9M | $9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.6M | $9.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1M | $12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.5M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.8M | $8.3M |
| Q4 25 | $531.0M | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $514.2M | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $514.3M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $407.8M | $8.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $408.6M | $8.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $409.3M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $410.0M | $8.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $410.7M | $9.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $66.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $66.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $65.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $65.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $67.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $65.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $63.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $63.2M |
| Q4 25 | $505.3M | $83.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $492.9M | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $494.8M | $83.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $385.2M | $83.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $393.5M | $85.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $387.4M | $89.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $383.7M | $82.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $381.2M | $80.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.14× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $27.7M | $669.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -18.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 23.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $462.0K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.7M | $669.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.5M | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.9M | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.1M | $3.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $538.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | -18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -19.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 15.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.02× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.57× | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.17× | 2.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.32× | 186.59× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.77× | 2.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NEN
Segment breakdown not available.
SLNG
| Natural Gas Gathering Transportation Marketing And Processing | $11.1M | 84% |
| Other | $1.3M | 10% |
| Services | $897.0K | 7% |