vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (NEN) and Voyager Technologies, Inc. (VOYG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Voyager Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($35.2M vs $23.6M, roughly 1.5× NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP). Voyager Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -130.4% vs -677.3%, a 547.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs 2.1%).
New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership is a real estate investment entity that owns, operates and manages residential and commercial properties primarily across the U.S. New England region. Its core assets include multifamily apartments, mixed-use properties and small commercial spaces, serving tenants across Massachusetts, New Hampshire and adjacent states, delivering steady returns to unitholders via rental income and property value growth.
NEN vs VOYG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.6M | $35.2M |
| Net Profit | $-1.4M | $-45.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | -4.4% |
| Operating Margin | 14.0% | — |
| Net Margin | -677.3% | -130.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.7% | 2.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -133.0% | -64.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $35.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.6M | $46.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.2M | $45.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-45.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.4M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-521.8K | $-16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $-31.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.0% | -60.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.3% | -52.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -130.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -677.3% | -70.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.2% | -41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | -68.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.75 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.52 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.23 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $26.7M | $429.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $531.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $404.5M |
| Total Assets | $505.3M | $1.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $429.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $26.7M | $491.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.4M | $413.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.7M | $468.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $531.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $514.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $514.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $407.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $408.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $409.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $410.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $404.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $590.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $554.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $505.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $492.9M | $727.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $494.8M | $685.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $385.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $393.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $387.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $383.7M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $27.7M | $-39.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-66.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -189.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-263.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-39.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $27.7M | $-60.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.5M | $-30.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-66.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-54.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-53.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-88.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -189.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -116.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -135.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -194.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 97.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 126.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.02× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.57× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.17× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.32× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.