vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NATIONAL FUEL GAS CO (NFG) and ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC. (WMS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($693.4M vs $425.9M, roughly 1.6× NATIONAL FUEL GAS CO). NATIONAL FUEL GAS CO runs the higher net margin — 35.7% vs 13.5%, a 22.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NATIONAL FUEL GAS CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.7% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, NATIONAL FUEL GAS CO's revenue compounded faster (12.1% CAGR vs 3.0%).
National Fuel Gas Company is a diversified energy company with $6.2 billion in assets distributed among the following five operating segments: Exploration and Production, Pipeline and Storage, Gathering, Utility, and Energy Marketing. National Fuel Gas was incorporated in 1902 and is based in Williamsville, New York.
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (ADS) is an American company that designs, manufactures and markets polypropylene and polyethylene pipes, plastic leach field chambers and systems, septic tanks and accessories, storm retention/detention and septic chambers, polyvinyl chloride drainage structures, fittings, and water filters and water separators. It is the largest maker of high-density polyethylene pipe in the United States. It is headquartered in Hilliard, Ohio. In 2020, 93% of the company's s...
NFG vs WMS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $425.9M | $693.4M |
| Net Profit | $152.0M | $93.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.4% |
| Operating Margin | 81.5% | 19.7% |
| Net Margin | 35.7% | 13.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.7% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 15.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.59 | $1.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $425.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $637.9M | $693.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $443.1M | $850.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $527.4M | $829.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $734.8M | $615.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $513.8M | $690.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $310.0M | $782.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.6M | $815.3M |
| Q1 26 | $152.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $181.6M | $93.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.3M | $156.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.8M | $143.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $216.4M | $77.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.0M | $81.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-167.6M | $130.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-54.2M | $161.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 86.6% | 37.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 40.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 94.7% | 39.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.6% | 36.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 87.3% | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 98.5% | 40.8% |
| Q1 26 | 81.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.3% | 19.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.6% | 26.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.7% | 24.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.2% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.8% | 18.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -63.4% | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -15.2% | 27.7% |
| Q1 26 | 35.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.5% | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.2% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.4% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.4% | 12.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.8% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -54.1% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.0% | 19.8% |
| Q1 26 | $1.59 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.98 | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $1.99 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.64 | $1.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.37 | $0.99 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.49 | $1.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.81 | $1.67 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.59 | $2.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $300.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $9.1B | $4.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $271.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.2M | $812.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.3M | $638.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.0M | $463.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.7M | $488.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.2M | $613.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.4M | $541.6M |
| Q1 26 | $300.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-76.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $9.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.2B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.7B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.3B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5B | $3.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.90× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.99× | 0.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 532.10× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $657.3M | $269.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $183.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 26.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 117.0% | 12.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.32× | 2.88× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $577.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $657.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $274.9M | $269.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $237.8M | $234.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $388.4M | $275.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.8M | $41.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $220.1M | $189.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.9M | $166.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $281.8M | $183.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | $183.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-47.8M | $176.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $195.3M | $222.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $59.9M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-20.3M | $135.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-49.1M | $112.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.5M | $125.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.4% | 26.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.8% | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.0% | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.2% | -0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | 19.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.8% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.5% | 15.4% |
| Q1 26 | 117.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.5% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 64.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.6% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.4% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.8% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 79.7% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.7% | 7.1% |
| Q1 26 | 4.32× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.51× | 2.88× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.21× | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.59× | 1.91× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.17× | 0.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.89× | 2.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NFG
| Revenues from External Customers | $425.8M | 100% |
| Intersegment Revenues | $126.0K | 0% |
WMS
| Reportable Segment Aggregation Before Other Operating Segment | $557.3M | 80% |
| Other | $85.5M | 12% |
| Pipe | $35.5M | 5% |
| Allied Products And Other | $15.0M | 2% |
