vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM) and T1 Energy Inc. (TE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($327.6M vs $210.5M, roughly 1.6× T1 Energy Inc.). Navios Maritime Partners L.P. runs the higher net margin — 21.4% vs -62.0%, a 83.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. is a multinational, vertically integrated seaborne shipping and logistics company focused on the transport and transshipment of drybulk commodities including iron ore, coal and grain.
Sony Energy Devices Corporation , is a Japanese multinational company specializing in a variety of areas in the energy industry, and is a wholly owned subsidiary and part of the Devices Group of Sony. The company was established in February 1975 in Fukushima, Japan.
NMM vs TE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $327.6M | $210.5M |
| Net Profit | $69.9M | $-130.6M |
| Gross Margin | 90.5% | 10.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -45.0% |
| Net Margin | 21.4% | -62.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -31.1% | -375.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $210.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $327.6M | $132.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $53.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $342.2M | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 23 | $346.9M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $280.7M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-130.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.9M | $-31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-16.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $101.5M | $-27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-28.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | $112.3M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $118.2M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 90.5% | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 88.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 87.9% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 92.3% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -45.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -22.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -62.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.4% | -24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -30.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 32.4% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 42.1% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $377.0M | $34.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.0B | $547.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $96.9M |
| Total Assets | $5.9B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 5.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $34.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $377.0M | $8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $181.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $272.0M | $219.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $249.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | $261.4M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $163.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $547.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $591.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $603.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $602.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $1.1B | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $96.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $183.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $201.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $538.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $561.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $582.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $2.0B | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $615.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $644.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $670.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $3.7B | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 5.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 23 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 0.54× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $63.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $55.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 26.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-42.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $63.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $33.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-44.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-28.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-16.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-74.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-34.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-35.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-37.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -138.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 54.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NMM
Segment breakdown not available.
TE
| Related Party | $120.1M | 57% |
| Nonrelated Party | $90.4M | 43% |
