vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($71.1M vs $57.8M, roughly 1.2× Nano Dimension Ltd.). RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 2.0% vs -171.1%, a 173.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($33.5M vs $-21.1M).
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
RE/MAX is an international real estate franchise operating in over 100 countries and territories that, in 2015, had over 100,000 agents in 6,800 offices.
NNDM vs RMAX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $57.8M | $71.1M |
| Net Profit | $-98.8M | $1.4M |
| Gross Margin | 43.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -155.1% | 13.1% |
| Net Margin | -171.1% | 2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -1.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -75.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.45 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $71.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $73.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $74.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $72.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $78.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.4M | $78.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $78.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-98.8M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $966.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-79.2M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -155.1% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -171.1% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -279.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -4.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.45 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.35 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $317.2M | $118.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $432.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $860.0M | $452.4M |
| Total Assets | $902.5M | $582.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.96× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $118.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $107.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $94.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $89.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $317.2M | $96.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $83.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.8M | $66.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $82.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $432.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $433.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $434.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $435.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $436.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $437.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $438.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $439.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $452.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $448.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $442.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $433.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $860.0M | $429.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $423.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $870.3M | $418.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $412.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $582.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $582.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $574.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $571.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $902.5M | $581.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $578.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $911.0M | $571.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $566.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.07× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.9M | $40.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-21.1M | $33.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -36.5% | 47.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 10.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 28.39× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $56.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $40.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $59.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.7M | $15.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $33.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.1M | $53.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 47.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.5% | 73.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.39× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.22× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NNDM
Segment breakdown not available.
RMAX
| Franchising Segment | $50.1M | 70% |
| Broker Fees | $13.9M | 20% |
| Annual Dues | $7.4M | 10% |
