vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and SHORE BANCSHARES INC (SHBI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SHORE BANCSHARES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($59.1M vs $57.8M, roughly 1.0× Nano Dimension Ltd.). SHORE BANCSHARES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($59.2M vs $-21.1M).
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
Shore Bancshares Inc. is a U.S. regional bank holding company headquartered in Maryland. It offers a full range of retail and commercial banking services, including deposit products, personal and commercial loans, and wealth management solutions, primarily serving local individual customers, small businesses and mid-sized enterprises in its operating regions.
NNDM vs SHBI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $57.8M | $59.1M |
| Net Profit | $-98.8M | — |
| Gross Margin | 43.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -155.1% | 35.2% |
| Net Margin | -171.1% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | 11.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.45 | $0.48 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $59.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $56.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $56.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $53.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $52.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $50.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.4M | $50.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $47.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-98.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-79.2M | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 34.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -155.1% | 34.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 27.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 26.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -171.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -279.4% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 17.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.45 | $0.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.35 | $0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $317.2M | $355.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $89.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $860.0M | $589.9M |
| Total Assets | $902.5M | $6.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $355.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $416.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $185.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $389.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $317.2M | $459.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $183.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.8M | $138.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $114.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $89.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $74.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $74.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $73.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $123.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $122.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $72.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $589.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $577.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $565.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $552.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $860.0M | $541.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $533.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $870.3M | $522.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $515.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $902.5M | $6.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $911.0M | $5.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.14× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.9M | $62.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-21.1M | $59.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -36.5% | 100.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 5.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $110.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $62.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $42.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-8.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.7M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $59.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $41.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-9.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.1M | $41.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $614.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 100.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 74.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.5% | 78.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.96× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.29× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
