vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of North American Construction Group Ltd. (NOA) and Take-Two Interactive (TTWO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Take-Two Interactive is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $860.2M, roughly 2.0× North American Construction Group Ltd.). North American Construction Group Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 4.7% vs -5.5%, a 10.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, North American Construction Group Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (58.0% CAGR vs 10.2%).
Shanghai Construction (Group) Corporation (SCG) is a Chinese construction and engineering company, ranked as the 16th largest construction company in the world based on 2011 revenues.
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is an American video game holding company based in New York City founded by Ryan Brant in September 1993.
NOA vs TTWO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $860.2M | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $40.5M | $-92.9M |
| Gross Margin | 19.7% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | 15.4% | -2.3% |
| Net Margin | 4.7% | -5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 24.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 25.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $860.2M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $573.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $297.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $636.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $439.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $244.3M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $-92.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.5M | $-133.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.0M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.5M | $-3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-125.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.5M | $-365.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.1M | $-262.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.8M | $-2.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | 55.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.7% | 55.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.1% | 62.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.0% | 50.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.0% | 53.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.3% | 57.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.8% | 33.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.4% | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.0% | -238.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.9% | -22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | -13.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.5% | -193.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | -7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | -235.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | -27.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | -19.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.9% | -207.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-21.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.52 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-17.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $2.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $3.5B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $10.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $879.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $776.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | $10.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $9.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $13.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $12.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $12.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $140.7M | $305.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $236.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.47× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $487.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $305.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.7M | $128.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.4M | $-44.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.0M | $279.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $109.5M | $-128.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.0M | $-191.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.8M | $-8.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $236.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $96.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-69.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $224.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-48.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-165.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-226.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-55.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.47× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.65× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.11× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.46× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.