vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nomad Foods Ltd (NOMD) and STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. (STRL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nomad Foods Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($834.9M vs $825.7M, roughly 1.0× STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.). On growth, STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (91.6% vs -2.6%).
Nomad Foods is the largest frozen food company in Europe, whose popular brands include Birds Eye, Ledo, Iglo, Findus, and Frikom. The company manufactures, sells and distributes a range of frozen food products across 22 European markets, with its headquarters in the United Kingdom. The most popular products in Nomad Foods’ portfolio include fish fingers, creamed spinach, peas and chicken. Nomad Foods is listed on the New York Stock Exchange trading under the ticker “NOMD”.
Sterling & Wilson is an Indian multinational engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) company headquartered in Mumbai, Maharashtra. It operates across multiple sectors including renewable energy, data centers, diesel power generation, and mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) services. The company has delivered projects in over 30 countries, with execution teams located across Asia, the Middle East, Africa, Europe, and Australia.
NOMD vs STRL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $834.9M | $825.7M |
| Net Profit | — | $96.0M |
| Gross Margin | 25.6% | 23.5% |
| Operating Margin | 9.1% | 16.7% |
| Net Margin | — | 11.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.6% | 91.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 143.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $3.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $825.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $834.9M | $755.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $689.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $614.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $430.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $856.9M | $498.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $593.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $582.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $87.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $92.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $71.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $39.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.5M | $113.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $51.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.6% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.5% | 21.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.1% | 15.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.5% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.5% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.09 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.82 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.97 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.28 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.97 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.67 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $511.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.5B | $287.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $6.8B | $2.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.92× | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $511.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $390.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $306.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $699.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $638.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $664.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $648.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $540.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $287.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $881.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $805.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $808.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $716.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $670.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.92× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $357.2M | $165.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $272.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 32.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.2% | 2.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.3B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $165.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $357.2M | $186.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $85.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $84.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $470.2M | $174.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $152.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $121.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $272.4M | $159.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $72.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $67.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $383.5M | $158.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $138.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $92.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.6% | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.8% | 31.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.2% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.47× | 1.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.33× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NOMD
Segment breakdown not available.
STRL
| E-Infrastructure Solutions | $597.7M | 72% |
| Transportation Solutions | $132.9M | 16% |
| Building Solutions | $95.1M | 12% |
