vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP) and Ostin Technology Group Co., Ltd. (OST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($37.8M vs $20.8M, roughly 1.8× Ostin Technology Group Co., Ltd.). Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.1% vs -24.8%, a 25.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ostin Technology Group Co., Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (39.2% vs 28.8%).
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. is a specialty insurance holding company that offers a broad portfolio of property and casualty insurance products, with a core focus on residential and commercial flood insurance for customers across the United States. It serves both individual consumers and small to mid-sized business clients, using advanced data analytics to support accurate policy pricing and robust risk management.
Ostin Technology Group Co., Ltd. is a provider of display and interactive technology solutions. It develops and manufactures touch panels, interactive whiteboards and custom display modules, serving consumer electronics, education and commercial segments across Asia Pacific, North America and European markets.
NP vs OST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $37.8M | $20.8M |
| Net Profit | $50.0K | $-5.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 9.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -23.4% |
| Net Margin | 0.1% | -24.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.8% | 39.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 0.0% | -11.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $-2.98 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $37.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $20.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.0M |
| Q1 26 | $50.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -23.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -25.3% |
| Q1 26 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -24.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -31.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.98 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $2.7M |
| Total Assets | — | $52.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $247.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-509.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-374.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $52.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $51.4M |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
