vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Enpro Inc. (NPO) and RBC Bearings INC (RBC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RBC Bearings INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($461.6M vs $295.4M, roughly 1.6× Enpro Inc.). RBC Bearings INC runs the higher net margin — 14.6% vs -10.8%, a 25.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RBC Bearings INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.0% vs 14.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Enpro Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs 5.6%).
Enpro is a US-based industrial technology company that designs and manufactures products and materials for technology-intensive sectors. The company serves industries such as semiconductors, aerospace, power generation, heavy-duty trucking, agricultural machinery, chemical processing, pulp and paper, and life sciences from 61 primary manufacturing facilities located in 12 countries, worldwide. It is organized under three segments: Sealing Technologies, Advanced Surface Technologies, and Engin...
Dover Corporation is an American conglomerate manufacturer of industrial products. The Downers Grove, Illinois-based company was founded in 1955. As of 2021, Dover's business was divided into five segments: Engineered Products, Clean Energy and Fueling, Imaging & Identification, Pumps & Process Solutions and Climate and Sustainability Technologies. Dover is a constituent of the S&P 500 index and trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol DOV. Dover was ranked 448 in the 2024 Fortu...
NPO vs RBC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $295.4M | $461.6M |
| Net Profit | $-32.0M | $67.4M |
| Gross Margin | 42.1% | 44.3% |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | 22.3% |
| Net Margin | -10.8% | 14.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.3% | 17.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -330.2% | 16.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.50 | $2.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $295.4M | $461.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $286.6M | $455.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $288.1M | $436.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $273.2M | $437.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.4M | $394.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $260.9M | $397.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.9M | $406.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $257.5M | $413.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-32.0M | $67.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.6M | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.4M | $68.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.5M | $72.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.9M | $57.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.8M | $54.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.7M | $61.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 42.1% | 44.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.9% | 44.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.3% | 44.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.3% | 44.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.3% | 44.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.3% | 43.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.8% | 45.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 41.2% | 43.1% |
| Q4 25 | 11.2% | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.3% | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.9% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | 23.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.5% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.1% | 21.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.7% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.9% | 22.8% |
| Q4 25 | -10.8% | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.6% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-1.50 | $2.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.01 | $1.90 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.25 | $2.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.15 | $2.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.65 | $1.82 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.94 | $1.65 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.27 | $1.90 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.59 | $1.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $114.7M | $107.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $655.3M | $990.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $3.3B |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.42× | 0.30× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $114.7M | $107.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.9M | $91.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.1M | $132.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $240.3M | $36.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $236.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $206.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $175.9M | $76.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $163.9M | $63.5M |
| Q4 25 | $655.3M | $990.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $915.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $920.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $640.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $644.9M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $4.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | $4.7B |
| Q4 25 | 0.42× | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.46× | 0.43× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $122.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $99.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 21.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.1% | 5.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.81× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $122.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.3M | $88.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.2M | $120.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.4M | $84.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.2M | $97.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $99.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $53.4M | $71.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $42.3M | $104.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.1M | $73.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.3M | $88.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 21.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.7% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | 18.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.1% | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.1% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.02× | 1.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.98× | 1.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.27× | 1.45× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.73× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | 1.59× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.50× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NPO
| Sealing Technologies Segment | $187.0M | 63% |
| General Industrial | $71.3M | 24% |
| Power Generation | $19.9M | 7% |
| Oiland Gas Market | $15.0M | 5% |
| Semiconductors | $2.2M | 1% |
RBC
| Domestic | $413.3M | 90% |
| Foreign | $48.3M | 10% |
