vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP (NRP) and RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (RYTM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($57.3M vs $51.3M, roughly 1.1× NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP). NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP runs the higher net margin — 78.5% vs -83.0%, a 161.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (36.9% vs -21.8%). Over the past eight quarters, RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (48.5% CAGR vs -8.3%).
Natural Resource Partners LP is a U.S.-headquartered master limited partnership that owns, manages and leases mineral reserve interests. Its asset portfolio covers coal, aggregates, industrial minerals and oil & gas, with operations primarily across North America, deriving most revenue from royalties paid by third-party resource extraction operators.
Rhythm Pharmaceuticals is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on developing and commercializing targeted therapies for rare genetic disorders causing severe unmanageable obesity, including POMC deficiency, LEPR deficiency, and Bardet-Biedl syndrome. It serves patients in North America and Europe who lack effective standard treatments for their chronic life-altering conditions.
NRP vs RYTM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $51.3M | $57.3M |
| Net Profit | $40.3M | $-47.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 91.6% |
| Operating Margin | 83.7% | -82.2% |
| Net Margin | 78.5% | -83.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -21.8% | 36.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -28.4% | -9.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.73 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $57.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $51.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $48.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.3M | $32.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.8M | $41.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.4M | $33.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.6M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $65.6M | $26.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-47.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-52.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-46.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.3M | $-49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.8M | $-43.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.6M | $-43.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.1M | $-32.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.2M | $-141.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 91.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 89.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 88.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 88.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 90.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 88.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 89.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 89.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -82.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -102.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -93.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 83.7% | -143.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 74.9% | -98.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 84.9% | -132.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 92.3% | -139.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 91.0% | -538.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -83.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -103.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -96.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 78.5% | -151.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 69.2% | -103.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 76.6% | -131.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 84.4% | -110.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 85.7% | -544.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.73 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.82 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.75 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.73 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.55 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $30.9M | $388.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $138.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $139.1M |
| Total Assets | $772.5M | $480.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $388.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $416.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $291.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.9M | $314.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.4M | $320.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.9M | $298.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.3M | $319.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0M | $201.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $142.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $210.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $188.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $139.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $148.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $39.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $61.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $480.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $506.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $372.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $772.5M | $386.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $772.9M | $392.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $772.9M | $363.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $789.6M | $381.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $772.9M | $258.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $34.4M | $-25.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.86× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-25.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-26.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-23.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.4M | $-40.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.2M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.1M | $-25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.6M | $-29.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $71.5M | $-40.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.55× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.23× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.27× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NRP
| Coal Royalty Revenues | $35.5M | 69% |
| Soda Ash Segment | $4.6M | 9% |
| Transportation And Processing Services | $4.4M | 9% |
| Production Lease Minimum Revenues | $2.7M | 5% |
| Oil And Gas Royalty Revenues | $2.4M | 5% |
| Other | $1.6M | 3% |
RYTM
Segment breakdown not available.
