vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NORTECH SYSTEMS INC (NSYS) and SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($39.4M vs $30.3M, roughly 1.3× NORTECH SYSTEMS INC). SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC runs the higher net margin — 54.9% vs 3.0%, a 52.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NORTECH SYSTEMS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.9% vs 1.1%). SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.4M vs $5.5M). Over the past eight quarters, SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC's revenue compounded faster (14.1% CAGR vs -5.9%).
Nortech Systems Inc is a global electronics manufacturing services provider. It delivers end-to-end solutions covering product design, prototyping, full-scale production, and supply chain management for clients operating in medical technology, industrial automation, aerospace and defense, and transportation sectors. It specializes in high-reliability, regulatory-compliant electronic components and assemblies tailored to strict industry standards.
SandRidge Energy, Inc. is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Mid-Continent region of the United States. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
NSYS vs SD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.3M | $39.4M |
| Net Profit | $897.0K | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | 16.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 3.0% | 38.5% |
| Net Margin | 3.0% | 54.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.9% | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 160.7% | 23.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $30.3M | $39.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.5M | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.7M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.9M | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.6M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.4M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.9M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.2M | $30.3M |
| Q4 25 | $897.0K | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-146.0K | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $313.0K | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.5M | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-739.0K | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.0K | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $765.0K | $11.1M |
| Q4 25 | 16.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.3% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.5% | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 54.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.5% | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 56.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.9% | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.2% | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.4% | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.32 | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.05 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.48 | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.51 | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.27 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.05 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.26 | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.7M | $111.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $34.5M | $510.9M |
| Total Assets | $71.9M | $644.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $101.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $652.0K | $102.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $99.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $916.0K | $98.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2M | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $209.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0M | $207.0M |
| Q4 25 | $34.5M | $510.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.4M | $492.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.4M | $480.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.8M | $464.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.0M | $460.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.7M | $446.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.1M | $424.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.0M | $419.7M |
| Q4 25 | $71.9M | $644.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.8M | $619.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $74.8M | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.5M | $588.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $72.4M | $581.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.0M | $565.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.3M | $529.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $75.5M | $527.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.6M | $31.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $5.5M | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.0% | 36.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 43.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.25× | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.1M | $41.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.6M | $31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-92.0K | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $157.0K | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.9M | $20.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $793.0K | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.6M | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.3M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8M | $15.7M |
| Q4 25 | $5.5M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-242.0K | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.0K | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.2M | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $503.0K | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.6M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.6M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | 18.0% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.8% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.9% | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.2% | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.5% | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | 6.25× | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.30× | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.70× | 1.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NSYS
| Medical Imaging | $11.4M | 37% |
| Medical Device | $8.0M | 26% |
| Industrial | $7.3M | 24% |
| Aerospace And Defense | $3.7M | 12% |
SD
| Oil Reserves | $19.0M | 48% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $11.6M | 30% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $8.7M | 22% |