vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP (NTIC) and Rumble Inc. (RUM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Rumble Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($27.1M vs $23.3M, roughly 1.2× NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP). NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 1.0% vs -120.8%, a 121.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.2% vs -10.5%). NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-479.7K vs $-31.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Rumble Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (15.2% CAGR vs 5.8%).
Maxar Technologies Inc., was an American space technology company, specializing in geospatial intelligence, Earth observation, and on-orbit satellite servicing, satellite products, and related services. DigitalGlobe and MDA Holdings Company merged to become Maxar Technologies on October 5, 2017.
Rumble is a Canadian-American online video platform, web hosting, and cloud services business headquartered in Toronto, Canada, with its U.S. headquarters in Longboat Key, Florida. It was founded in 2013 by Chris Pavlovski, a Canadian technology entrepreneur. Rumble's cloud services business hosts Truth Social, and the video platform is popular among American conservative and far-right users. Rumble has been described as "alt-tech".
NTIC vs RUM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.3M | $27.1M |
| Net Profit | $237.8K | $-32.7M |
| Gross Margin | 36.0% | 5.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | -131.1% |
| Net Margin | 1.0% | -120.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.2% | -10.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -57.6% | 86.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $23.3M | $27.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.3M | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.1M | $23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.3M | $30.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.3M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.7M | $22.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.8M | $17.7M |
| Q4 25 | $237.8K | $-32.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.1M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $121.8K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $434.3K | $-2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $561.1K | $-236.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8M | $-31.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $976.6K | $-26.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $-43.3M |
| Q4 25 | 36.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.9% | -1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.6% | -26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.3% | -14.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.8% | -45.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.2% | -58.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.0% | -79.5% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | -131.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | -113.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.7% | -153.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | -80.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | -131.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | -172.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | -197.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | -120.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.9% | -65.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | -11.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | -783.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.9% | -125.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -119.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.2% | -244.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $-1.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.19 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.17 | $-0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.4M | $237.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $72.4M | $274.8M |
| Total Assets | $104.0M | $336.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $6.4M | $237.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | $269.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.1M | $301.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.6M | $114.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0M | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.8M | $154.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.8M | $183.8M |
| Q4 25 | $72.4M | $274.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.1M | $302.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.7M | $339.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.2M | $-63.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $71.2M | $166.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $68.9M | $192.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $68.4M | $210.7M |
| Q4 25 | $104.0M | $336.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.7M | $367.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $93.7M | $391.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.0M | $195.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $94.7M | $217.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.3M | $243.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $87.3M | $263.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $341.9K | $-29.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-479.7K | $-31.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.1% | -117.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.5% | 8.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.44× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-1.8M | $-70.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $341.9K | $-29.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $609.7K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $803.7K | $-14.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-19.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-33.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-479.7K | $-31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-171.2K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $293.1K | $-14.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-19.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $869.4K | $-23.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-34.3M |
| Q4 25 | -2.1% | -117.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.3% | -48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | -61.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -40.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -79.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | -102.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -193.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.27× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.99× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NTIC
| Inside The USA To Unaffiliated Customers | $7.5M | 32% |
| Natur Tec | $6.0M | 26% |
| Acobal | $3.6M | 15% |
| Other | $2.7M | 12% |
| BR | $2.1M | 9% |
| Zerust OY | $1.4M | 6% |
RUM
| Audience Monetization | $23.8M | 88% |
| Other Initiatives | $3.3M | 12% |