vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) and SuperCom Ltd (SPCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.0M vs $14.2M, roughly 1.6× SuperCom Ltd). SuperCom Ltd runs the higher net margin — 37.5% vs -416.2%, a 453.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (78.8% vs -1.5%). SuperCom Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-3.6M vs $-69.4M).
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. is an American clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on developing novel, potentially curative therapeutics leveraging CRISPR-based technologies. The company's in vivo programs use intravenously administered CRISPR as the therapy, in which the company's proprietary delivery technology enables highly precise editing of disease-causing genes directly within specific target tissues. Intellia's ex vivo programs use CRISPR to create the therapy by using engineere...
Super.com is a technology company headquartered in San Francisco and co-founded by Hussein Fazal and Henry Shi. The company provides financial services, including reward programs and travel bookings.
NTLA vs SPCB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.0M | $14.2M |
| Net Profit | $-95.8M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 61.2% |
| Operating Margin | -428.9% | 16.3% |
| Net Margin | -416.2% | 37.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 78.8% | -1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 25.7% | 79.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.81 | $1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $23.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.2M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-95.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-101.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-101.3M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-114.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-128.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-135.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-147.0M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-107.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 61.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -428.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -808.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -772.2% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -726.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1059.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1589.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1998.6% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -394.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -416.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -735.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -710.8% | 37.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -687.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1001.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1489.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2112.6% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -371.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.81 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.92 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.98 | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.10 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.27 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.34 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.52 | $1.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.12 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $449.9M | $15.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $23.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $671.4M | $37.3M |
| Total Assets | $842.1M | $65.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $449.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $511.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $459.7M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $503.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $601.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $658.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $691.1M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $791.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $671.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $748.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $715.3M | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $779.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $872.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $962.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $971.1M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $842.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $925.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $898.9M | $65.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $986.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $49.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-69.3M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-69.4M | $-3.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -301.6% | -25.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 10.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-395.9M | $-14.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-69.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-76.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-99.6M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-148.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-85.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-84.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-58.2M | $-950.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-120.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-69.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-76.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-99.9M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-149.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-86.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-86.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-59.2M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-123.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | -301.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -558.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -701.0% | -25.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -900.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -669.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -945.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -850.9% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -425.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NTLA
| Avencell Therapeutics Inc | $21.0M | 91% |
| Other | $1.0M | 4% |
| Avencell | $1.0M | 4% |
SPCB
Segment breakdown not available.