vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nvidia (NVDA) and Zebra Technologies (ZBRA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nvidia is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($68.1B vs $1.5B, roughly 46.2× Zebra Technologies). Nvidia runs the higher net margin — 63.1% vs 4.7%, a 58.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Nvidia posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (73.2% vs 10.6%). Nvidia produced more free cash flow last quarter ($34.9B vs $327.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Nvidia's revenue compounded faster (61.7% CAGR vs 12.0%).
Nvidia Corporation is an American technology company headquartered in Santa Clara, California. Founded in 1993 by Jensen Huang, Chris Malachowsky, and Curtis Priem, it develops graphics processing units (GPUs), systems on chips (SoCs), and application programming interfaces (APIs) for data science, high-performance computing, video games, and mobile and automotive applications. Nvidia has been described as a Big Tech company.
Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBR), commonly known as Zebra, is an American multinational technology conglomerate corporation specializing in smart data capture systems. Zebra is headquartered in Lincolnshire, Illinois outside of Chicago with 10,700 employees across 57 countries.
NVDA vs ZBRA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $68.1B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $43.0B | $70.0M |
| Gross Margin | 75.0% | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | 65.0% | 9.4% |
| Net Margin | 63.1% | 4.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 73.2% | 10.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 94.5% | -57.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.76 | $1.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $68.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $57.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.0B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $43.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $31.9B | $70.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.4B | $101.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8B | $112.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.1B | $136.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3B | $163.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.6B | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9B | $113.0M |
| Q1 26 | 75.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 73.4% | 47.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 72.4% | 48.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.5% | 47.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 73.0% | 49.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 74.6% | 48.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 75.1% | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 78.4% | 48.4% |
| Q1 26 | 65.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 63.2% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.8% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.1% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.1% | 14.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 62.3% | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 62.1% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.9% | 13.7% |
| Q1 26 | 63.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 56.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.5% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.6% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.2% | 10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.0% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.3% | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.1% | 9.3% |
| Q1 26 | $1.76 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.30 | $1.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.08 | $1.97 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.76 | $2.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.49 | $2.62 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.78 | $3.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.67 | $2.64 | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.98 | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.6B | $125.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.5B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $157.3B | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $206.8B | $8.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.05× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $10.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $60.6B | $125.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.7B | $872.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.2B | $879.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.5B | $901.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.8B | $676.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.4B | $411.0M |
| Q1 26 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7B | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | $157.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $118.9B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.1B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.8B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.3B | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.9B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.2B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.1B | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | $206.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $161.1B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.7B | $8.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $125.3B | $7.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.6B | $7.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.0B | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $85.2B | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.1B | $7.5B |
| Q1 26 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.08× | 0.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.10× | 0.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.11× | 0.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.15× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.20× | 0.66× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $36.2B | $357.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $34.9B | $327.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 51.2% | 22.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.9% | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.84× | 5.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $96.7B | $831.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $36.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.8B | $357.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.4B | $235.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.4B | $147.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6B | $178.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.6B | $306.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5B | $294.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.3B | $288.0M |
| Q1 26 | $34.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.1B | $327.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.5B | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.2B | $130.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.6B | $158.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.8B | $288.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.5B | $277.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.0B | $278.0M |
| Q1 26 | 51.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.8% | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.8% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.4% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.5% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 47.9% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.0% | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.5% | 22.8% |
| Q1 26 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 0.8% |
| Q1 26 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.74× | 5.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.58× | 2.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.46× | 1.31× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.75× | 1.31× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.91× | 1.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.87× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.03× | 2.55× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NVDA
| Compute | $51.3B | 75% |
| Networking | $11.0B | 16% |
| Gaming | $3.7B | 5% |
| Professional Visualization | $1.3B | 2% |
| Automotive | $604.0M | 1% |
| OEM And Other | $161.0M | 0% |
| Inventory Purchase Obligations In Excess Of Projections | $31.0M | 0% |
ZBRA
| Tangible Products | $1.2B | 83% |
| Service And Software | $255.0M | 17% |
