vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Northwest Natural Holding Co (NWN) and Rackspace Technology, Inc. (RXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Rackspace Technology, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($682.8M vs $394.2M, roughly 1.7× Northwest Natural Holding Co). On growth, Northwest Natural Holding Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.3% vs -0.4%). Rackspace Technology, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($56.0M vs $-131.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Rackspace Technology, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.6% CAGR vs -4.6%).
NW Natural, formerly Northwest Natural Gas Company, is an American publicly traded utility headquartered in Portland, Oregon, United States. Primarily a natural gas distributor, the company services residential, commercial, and industrial customers in Western Oregon and Southwest Washington in the Pacific Northwest. NW Natural also owns water utilities. Founded in 1859, the company has approximately 800,000 customers and revenues of over $1 billion annually.
Rackspace Technology, Inc. is an American cloud computing company based in San Antonio, Texas. It also has offices in Reston, Virginia, as well as in Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, India, Dubai, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Germany, Singapore, Mexico, Toronto and Hong Kong. Its data centers are located in Amsterdam (Netherlands), Virginia (USA), Chicago (USA), Dallas (USA), London (UK), Frankfurt (Germany), Hong Kong (China), Kansas City (USA), New York City (USA), San Jose (USA), Shangh...
NWN vs RXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $394.2M | $682.8M |
| Net Profit | — | $-32.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 17.6% |
| Operating Margin | 28.4% | -0.5% |
| Net Margin | — | -4.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.3% | -0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 41.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.38 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $394.2M | $682.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.7M | $671.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $236.2M | $666.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $494.3M | $665.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $370.9M | $685.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.9M | $675.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $211.7M | $684.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $433.5M | $690.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-32.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-29.9M | $-67.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.5M | $-54.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $87.9M | $-71.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-56.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-27.2M | $-186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.8M | $25.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.8M | $-640.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 19.2% |
| Q4 25 | 28.4% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.5% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.5% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.2% | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.9% | -4.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.1% | -25.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | -7.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.3% | -94.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.1% | -10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.1% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.8% | -10.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.8% | -27.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.7% | -92.7% |
| Q4 25 | $1.38 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.73 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.18 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.12 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.71 | $-0.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.69 | $-2.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $36.7M | $105.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.4B | $2.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $-1.2B |
| Total Assets | $6.2B | $2.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.65× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $36.7M | $105.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.2M | $99.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.6M | $103.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $100.0M | $128.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.5M | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.0M | $157.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.2M | $190.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $72.4M | $282.6M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $3.0B |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $-1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $-1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $-1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $-1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $-1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $-949.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $-756.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $-787.2M |
| Q4 25 | $6.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.8B | $3.5B |
| Q4 25 | 1.65× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.23× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.17× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.17× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.3M | $59.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-131.0M | $56.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -33.2% | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 34.1% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-197.8M | $90.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.3M | $59.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.9M | $70.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.2M | $8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $179.6M | $12.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-19.4M | $54.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-26.4M | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $121.0M | $24.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.0M | $-90.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-131.0M | $56.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-125.9M | $42.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.3M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.4M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-119.6M | $34.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-121.7M | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.8M | $-118.4M |
| Q4 25 | -33.2% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -76.4% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.8% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -32.2% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -88.9% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | -2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.9% | -17.1% |
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 66.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.0% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 69.6% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.1% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.0% | 4.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.04× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.96× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.96× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NWN
| NWN Gas Utility | $341.4M | 87% |
| Alternativerevenue | $27.2M | 7% |
| Si Energy Gas Utility | $20.0M | 5% |
| NW Natural Other | $6.9M | 2% |
RXT
| Public Cloud Services Segment | $442.2M | 65% |
| Private Cloud Service Segment | $240.6M | 35% |
