vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT) and Ouster, Inc. (OUST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ouster, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($62.2M vs $62.1M, roughly 1.0× NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.). On growth, Ouster, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (106.6% vs -2.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Ouster, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (54.8% CAGR vs -4.1%).
NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust focused on acquiring, renovating, and operating multifamily residential properties primarily across high-growth Sun Belt markets in the United States. Its portfolio consists mainly of affordable and mid-tier apartment communities, targeting steady rental income growth and long-term asset value appreciation for investors.
Ouster, Inc. is an American lidar technology company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It builds high-resolution, digital 3D lidar sensors for use in autonomous vehicles, industrial, robotics, drones, mapping, defense, and security systems.
NXRT vs OUST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $62.1M | $62.2M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 60.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | -2.7% | 106.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $62.1M | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.8M | $39.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.1M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.2M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $63.8M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.1M | $28.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.2M | $27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $67.6M | $25.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.8M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.0M | $-20.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.9M | $-22.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.9M | $-25.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6M | $-23.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.3M | $-23.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 60.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.6% |
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.8% | -61.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | -76.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | -73.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.0% | -85.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.7% | -98.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.7% | -93.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 60.7% | -99.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.4% | -55.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.1% | -58.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.9% | -67.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -13.8% | -91.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.5% | -88.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.9% | -91.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.31 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.28 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.27 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.35 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.40 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.00 | $-0.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.7M | $208.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $295.5M | $261.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.9B | $349.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 5.39× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.7M | $208.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.8M | $244.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.6M | $226.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.7M | $168.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.1M | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4M | $151.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.3M | $184.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.2M | $187.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $295.5M | $261.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $322.9M | $247.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $347.9M | $221.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $379.9M | $167.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $410.4M | $180.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $447.1M | $171.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $491.1M | $170.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $512.8M | $167.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $349.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $353.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $321.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $268.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $276.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $255.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $309.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $317.7M |
| Q4 25 | 5.39× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.92× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $83.6M | $-15.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-37.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -59.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 35.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-64.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $83.6M | $-15.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.3M | $-18.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.9M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.3M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.6M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.8M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.7M | $-21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.7M | $-5.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-37.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-22.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | -59.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -50.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -81.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -27.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.86× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.75× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
