vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Orange County Bancorp, Inc. (OBT) and TELOS CORP (TLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TELOS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.8M vs $33.0M, roughly 1.4× Orange County Bancorp, Inc.). Orange County Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 37.6% vs -34.9%, a 72.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TELOS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (77.4% vs 20.6%). Orange County Bancorp, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($41.3M vs $8.0M). Over the past eight quarters, TELOS CORP's revenue compounded faster (25.7% CAGR vs 14.3%).
Orange County Bancorp, Inc. is a Delaware-registered bank holding company operating mainly in New York, U.S. It offers a full range of retail and commercial banking services, including deposit accounts, loans and wealth management solutions, serving individual consumers, small and mid-sized corporate clients in its regional footprint.
Telos Corporation is an information technology and cybersecurity company located in Ashburn, Virginia. Telos primarily serves government and enterprise clients, receiving a large number of its contracts from the United States Department of Defense. Customers are primarily military, intelligence and civilian agencies of the US government and NATO allies.
OBT vs TLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $33.0M | $46.8M |
| Net Profit | $12.4M | $-16.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.0% |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | -39.6% |
| Net Margin | 37.6% | -34.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.6% | 77.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 73.5% | -74.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.94 | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $33.0M | $46.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.7M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.5M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.0M | $30.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.4M | $26.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.1M | $23.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.9M | $28.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.3M | $29.6M |
| Q4 25 | $12.4M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.7M | $-8.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | $-28.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.3M | $-7.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 40.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 37.0% |
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | -39.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.6% | -4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.9% | -27.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.3% | -29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.8% | -37.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | -121.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.6% | -30.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.9% | -28.5% |
| Q4 25 | 37.6% | -34.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.7% | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.2% | -26.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.1% | -28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.2% | -35.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | -118.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.4% | -27.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.7% | -24.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.94 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.75 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.87 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.77 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.64 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.28 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.73 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.82 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $53.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $284.4M | $96.0M |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $139.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $53.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $59.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $57.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $57.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $54.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $80.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $93.9M |
| Q4 25 | $284.4M | $96.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $270.1M | $119.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $252.6M | $118.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $201.3M | $126.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $185.5M | $127.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $193.1M | $129.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $177.5M | $149.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $168.7M | $154.4M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $139.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $164.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $165.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $158.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $158.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $182.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | $195.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $43.8M | $8.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $41.3M | $8.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 125.1% | 17.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.6% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.53× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $69.6M | $29.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $43.8M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.2M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.0M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8M | $6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.6M | $-10.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2M | $-7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | $-350.0K |
| Q4 25 | $41.3M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.6M | $8.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3M | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.9M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.0M | $-7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | $-447.0K |
| Q4 25 | 125.1% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.8% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.5% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.5% | 19.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 120.0% | -47.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.7% | -30.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.8% | -28.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.9% | -1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.53× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.01× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.47× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.83× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.19× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.24× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OBT
Segment breakdown not available.
TLS
| Security Solutions Segment | $44.8M | 96% |
| Secure Networks Segment | $1.9M | 4% |
